Evaluating the use of a recommender system for selecting optimal messages for smoking cessation: patterns and effects of user-system engagement

  • Jinying Chen (Creator)
  • Thomas K. Houston (Creator)
  • Jamie M. Faro (Creator)
  • Catherine S. Nagawa (Creator)
  • Elizabeth A. Orvek (Creator)
  • Amanda C. Blok (Creator)
  • Jeroan Allison (Creator)
  • Sharina D. Person (Creator)
  • Bridget Marie Smith (Creator)
  • Rajani S. Sadasivam (Creator)



Abstract Background Motivational messaging is a frequently used digital intervention to promote positive health behavior changes, including smoking cessation. Typically, motivational messaging systems have not actively sought feedback on each message, preventing a closer examination of the user-system engagement. This study assessed the granular user-system engagement around a recommender system (a new system that actively sought user feedback on each message to improve message selection) for promoting smoking cessation and the impact of engagement on cessation outcome. Methods We prospectively followed a cohort of current smokers enrolled to use the recommender system for 6 months. The system sent participants motivational messages to support smoking cessation every 3 days and used machine learning to incorporate user feedback (i.e., user’s rating on the perceived influence of each message, collected on a 5-point Likert scale with 1 indicating strong disagreement and 5 indicating strong agreement on perceiving the influence on quitting smoking) to improve the selection of the following message. We assessed user-system engagement by various metrics, including user response rate (i.e., the percent of times a user rated the messages) and the perceived influence of messages. We compared retention rates across different levels of user-system engagement and assessed the association between engagement and the 7-day point prevalence abstinence (missing outcome = smoking) by using multiple logistic regression. Results We analyzed data from 731 participants (13% Black; 73% women). The user response rate was 0.24 (SD = 0.34) and user-perceived influence was 3.76 (SD = 0.84). The retention rate positively increased with the user response rate (trend test P
Date made available2021

Cite this