Over the last decade, the number of deceased kidney donors has plateaued, while the number of patients in need of a kidney transplant has substantially increased, resulting in longer waiting times and greater mortality. Increasing living donation in a safe and ethical manner can reduce the societal burden of end-stage renal disease. Living kidney donor evaluation entails extensive medical and psychosocial testing to minimize harm to donors, and detailed education about medical/surgical risks to ensure donor autonomy. However, living donors are usually excluded from participation in their own risk assessment and from engaging clinicians in a dialogue about the levels of risk that they will be permitted to undertake. Thresholds for acceptable risk are highly variable between transplant centers but commonly focus on medical risks.1 However, potential donors also experience non-medical risks and burdens,2 which may alter their assessment of an acceptable level of risk. Thus, transplant centers and potential donors may encounter ethical tensions surrounding the balance between non-maleficence and respect for donor autonomy. Establishing what donors perceive as relevant risks, how they quantify these risks, and what they deem acceptable tradeoffs for these risks is essential to developing a donor-centered approach to the living donor evaluation process. A donor-centered approach could enhance autonomy by allowing informed individuals to donate, inselected circumstances, when their risk of post-donation complications is higher than would typically be considered permissible by a transplant center. Aims • To delineate the medical and non-medical risks and burdens experienced by potential living kidney donors • To inform a normative analysis of the commensurability of different risks and benefits experienced by potential donors. • To re-evaluate the balance between transplant center non-maleficence and donor autonomy as applied to the decision to accept or reject a potential donor. Innovation & Potential Impact: We propose a prospective, longitudinal study of 200 potential living kidney donors at three high-volume transplant centers in the US. The study will leverage a multidisciplinary team and use mixed-methods, including novel applications of previously validated behavioral economics and social psychology instruments to assess donor attitudes toward risk taking and donor-recipient relationships. 3-6 Participants will undergo semi-structured interviews at: 1) the start of evaluation; 2) the donation decision is informed that he/she is ineligible to donate, the donor withdraws, or is informed that he/she is ineligible to donate, the donor withdraws, or the donor surgery is scheduled); and 3) six months following the donation decision. Data collection will be supplemented by an extensive review of the relevant bioethics and transplant literature to assist with development of the normative analyses outlined by the aims. This study has the potential to advance the debate within the transplant community about where to set the threshold of acceptable living donor risk, whether this threshold should be donor-specific, and who should establish it. Our results may provide normative support for the development of a donor/patient-centered model of donor approval based on greater donor involvement in risk assessment. This could significantly affect donor engagement in transplant centers’ decision-making processes and ultimately, the number of living kidney donors.
|Effective start/end date
|6/4/15 → 12/31/15
- Yale University (Agr. 06/04/2015)
Explore the research topics touched on by this project. These labels are generated based on the underlying awards/grants. Together they form a unique fingerprint.