Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3079-3133 |
Number of pages | 55 |
Journal | Journal of the American College of Cardiology |
Volume | 77 |
Issue number | 24 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 22 2021 |
Keywords
- clinical coding
- conflict of interest
- cultural diversity
- delivery of health care
- documentation
- electronic health records
- ethics
- health equity
- personal autonomy
- privacy
- professionalism
- racism
- social justice
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Access to Document
Other files and links
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 77, No. 24, 22.06.2021, p. 3079-3133.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - 2020 American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Consensus Conference on Professionalism and Ethics
T2 - A Consensus Conference Report
AU - Executive Committee
AU - Task Force 1
AU - Task Force 2
AU - Task Force 3
AU - Task Force 4
AU - Task Force 5
AU - Benjamin, Ivor J.
AU - Valentine, C. Michael
AU - Oetgen, William J.
AU - Sheehan, Katherine A.
AU - Brindis, Ralph G.
AU - Roach, William H.
AU - Harrington, Robert A.
AU - Levine, Glenn N.
AU - Redberg, Rita F.
AU - Broccolo, Bernadette M.
AU - Hernandez, Adrian F.
AU - Douglas, Pamela S.
AU - Piña, Ileana L.
AU - Benjamin, Emelia J.
AU - Coylewright, Megan J.
AU - Saucedo, Jorge F.
AU - Ferdinand, Keith C.
AU - Hayes, Sharonne N.
AU - Poppas, Athena
AU - Furie, Karen L.
AU - Mehta, Laxmi S.
AU - Erwin, John P.
AU - Mieres, Jennifer H.
AU - Murphy, Daniel J.
AU - Weissman, Gaby
AU - West, Colin P.
AU - Lawrence, Willie E.
AU - Masoudi, Frederick A.
AU - Jones, Camara P.
AU - Matlock, Daniel D.
AU - Miller, Jennifer E.
AU - Spertus, John A.
AU - Todman, Lynn
AU - Biga, Cathleen
AU - Chazal, Richard A.
AU - Creager, Mark A.
AU - Fry, Edward T.
AU - Mack, Michael J.
AU - Yancy, Clyde W.
AU - Anderson, Richard E.
N1 - Funding Information: Rationale: Because trust is critical in a merit-based grant review process, it is important to be proactive in declaring any COI that might develop during the tenure of a grant study section.Rationale: Tools founded on clinical research and expert consensus are available that can objectively help direct clinical decision making that is patient-centered and may reduce personal and system COIs. Such tools include AUC to guide testing and procedural care and CPGs to support the evaluation and treatment of patients with select cardiovascular disorders. AUC, CPGs, and clinical decision support mechanisms are derived from the study of populations of patients and must be applied carefully in the care of unique individual patients (224–226). Development of these evidence-based tools must be done with full disclosure of any personal or professional COIs by those contributing to the guidelines (227). AUC, CPGs, and clinical decision support mechanisms should not be used to withhold testing or treatment solely on the basis of efforts to reduce cost within value-based models of care.
PY - 2021/6/22
Y1 - 2021/6/22
KW - clinical coding
KW - conflict of interest
KW - cultural diversity
KW - delivery of health care
KW - documentation
KW - electronic health records
KW - ethics
KW - health equity
KW - personal autonomy
KW - privacy
KW - professionalism
KW - racism
KW - social justice
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111094986&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111094986&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 33994057
AN - SCOPUS:85111094986
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 77
SP - 3079
EP - 3133
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 24
ER -