A Case of Non-Syndromic Congenital Cataracts Caused by a Novel MAF Variant in the C-Terminal DNA-Binding Domain—Case Report and Literature Review

Sharon H. Zhao, Kai Lee Yap, Valerie Allegretti, Andy Drackley, Alexander Ing, Adam Gordon, Andrew Skol, Patrick McMullen, Brenda L. Bohnsack, Sudhi P. Kurup, Hantamalala Ralay Ranaivo, Jennifer L. Rossen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The MAF gene encodes a transcription factor in which pathogenic variants have been associated with both isolated and syndromic congenital cataracts. We aim to review the MAF variants in the C-terminal DNA-binding domain associated with non-syndromic congenital cataracts and describe a patient with a novel, disease-causing de novo missense variant. Published reports of C-terminal MAF variants and their associated congenital cataracts and ophthalmic findings were reviewed. The patient we present and his biological parents had genetic testing via a targeted gene panel followed by trio-based whole exome sequencing. A 4-year-old patient with a history of bilateral nuclear and cortical cataracts was found to have a novel, likely pathogenic de novo variant in MAF, NM_005360.5:c.922A>G (p.Lys308Glu). No syndromic findings or anterior segment abnormalities were identified. We report the novel missense variant, c.922A>G (p.Lys308Glu), in the C-terminal DNA-binding domain of MAF classified as likely pathogenic and associated with non-syndromic bilateral congenital cataracts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number686
JournalGenes
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2024

Keywords

  • MAF
  • bilateral congenital cataract
  • microcornea
  • non-syndromic cataract
  • whole exome sequencing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Case of Non-Syndromic Congenital Cataracts Caused by a Novel MAF Variant in the C-Terminal DNA-Binding Domain—Case Report and Literature Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this