A collaborative of leading health systems finds wide variations in total knee replacement delivery and takes steps to improve value

Ivan M. Tomek*, Allison L. Sabel, Mark I. Froimson, George Muschler, David S. Jevsevar, Karl M. Koenig, David G. Lewallen, James M. Naessens, Lucy A. Savitz, James L. Westrich, William B. Weeks, James N. Weinstein

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    53 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Members of a consortium of leading US health care systems, known as the High Value Healthcare Collaborative, used administrative data to examine differences in their delivery of primary total knee replacement. The goal was to identify opportunities to improve health care value by increasing the quality and reducing the cost of that procedure. The study showed substantial variations across the participating health care organizations in surgery times, hospital lengths-of-stay, discharge dispositions, and in-hospital complication rates. The study also revealed that higher surgeon caseloads were associated with shorter lengths-of-stay and operating time, as well as fewer in-hospital complications. These findings led the consortium to test more coordinated management for medically complex patients, more use of dedicated teams, and a process to improve the management of patients' expectations. These innovations are now being tried by the consortium's members to evaluate whether they increase health care value.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1329-1338
    Number of pages10
    JournalHealth Affairs
    Volume31
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 1 2012

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Health Policy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A collaborative of leading health systems finds wide variations in total knee replacement delivery and takes steps to improve value'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this