Abstract
Real world players often increase their payoffs by voluntarily committing to play a fixed strategy, prior to the start of a strategic game. In fact, the players may further benefit from commitments that are conditional on the commitments of others.This paper proposes a model of conditional commitments that unifies earlier models while avoiding circularities that often arise in such models.A commitment folk theorem shows that the potential of voluntary conditional commitments is essentially unlimited. All feasible and individually rational payoffs of a two-person strategic game can be attained at the equilibria of one (universal) commitment game that uses simple commitment devices. The commitments are voluntary in the sense that each player maintains the option of playing the game without commitment, as originally defined.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 127-137 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Games and Economic Behavior |
Volume | 69 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2010 |
Funding
This work was supported in part by NSF award SES-0734780 and by BSF grant no. 2004092. ✩ This paper replaces “Meta-Games and Program Equilibrium.” The research of Adam Tauman Kalai and Ehud Kalai is partially supported by the National Science Foundation grant no. SES-0527656 and by BSF grant no. 2004092. * Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (A.T. Kalai), [email protected] (E. Kalai), [email protected] (E. Lehrer), [email protected] (D. Samet).
Keywords
- C70
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics