TY - JOUR
T1 - A Comparison of Care Delivered in Hospital-based and Freestanding Emergency Departments
AU - Pines, Jesse M.
AU - Zocchi, Mark S.
AU - Black, Bernard S.
N1 - Funding Information:
From the Center for Healthcare Innovation & Policy Research, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Health Policy (JMP), and the Center for Healthcare Innovation & Policy Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences (MSZ), George Washington University, Washington DC; and the Pritzker School of Law and Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University (BSB), Chicago, IL. Received September 25, 2017; revision received December 16, 2017; accepted January 23, 2018. JMP and MSZ received funding from Adeptus Health, Inc. (“Adeptus”), for this study. Adeptus owns freestanding emergency departments (FSEDs) and provided data to us for these FSEDs. Adeptus had no input in the design, analysis, or writing of this study. BSB did not receive any funding from Adeptus for his participation in this study. The authors have no potential conflicts to disclose. JMP conceived the study; all authors designed the study; BSB provided advice and guidance on the methodologic approach; MSZ collected the data, performed data cleaning, and programmed the statistical analysis; all authors contributed to the interpretation of the data and the drafting of the manuscript; and JMP takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. Supervising Editor: Richard T. Griffey, MD, MPH. Address for correspondence and reprints: Mark S. Zocchi, MPH, e-mail: mzocchi@gwu.edu. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2018;25:538–550.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - Objective: We compare case mix, hospitalization rates, length of stay (LOS), and resource use in independent freestanding emergency departments (FSEDs) and hospital-based emergency departments (H-EDs). Methods: Data from 74 FSEDs (2013–2015) in Texas and Colorado were compared to H-ED data from the 2013–2014 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. In the unrestricted sample, large differences in visit characteristics (e.g., payer and case mix) were found between patients that use FSEDs compared to H-EDs. Therefore, we restricted our analysis to patients commonly treated in both settings (<65 years, privately insured, nonambulance) and used inverse propensity score weighting (IPW) to balance the two settings on observable patient characteristics. We then compared ED LOS and as well as hospital admission rates and resource utilization rates in the IPW-weighted samples. Results: Before balancing, FSEDs saw more young adults (age 25–44) and fewer older adults (age 45–64) than H-EDs. FSED patients had fewer comorbidities, more injuries and respiratory infections, and fewer diagnoses of chest or abdominal pain. In balanced samples, LOS for FSED visits was 46% shorter (60 minutes) than H-ED patients. Hospital admission rates were 37% lower overall (95% confidence interval = –51% to –23%) in FSEDs and varied considerably by primary discharge diagnosis. X-ray and electrocardiogram use was significantly lower at FSEDs while others measures of resource utilization were similar (ultrasound, computed tomography scans, and laboratory tests). Conclusion: In this sample of FSEDs, a greater proportion of younger patients with fewer comorbidities and more injuries and respiratory system diseases were evaluated, and almost all patients had private health insurance. When restricted to < 65 years, privately insured, and nonambulance patients in both samples, LOS was considerably shorter and hospital admission rates lower at FSEDs, as well as the use of some diagnostic testing. This study is limited as diagnoses codes may not fully capture severity and patients who perceived greater need of hospital admission may have chosen a H-ED over FSEDs.
AB - Objective: We compare case mix, hospitalization rates, length of stay (LOS), and resource use in independent freestanding emergency departments (FSEDs) and hospital-based emergency departments (H-EDs). Methods: Data from 74 FSEDs (2013–2015) in Texas and Colorado were compared to H-ED data from the 2013–2014 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. In the unrestricted sample, large differences in visit characteristics (e.g., payer and case mix) were found between patients that use FSEDs compared to H-EDs. Therefore, we restricted our analysis to patients commonly treated in both settings (<65 years, privately insured, nonambulance) and used inverse propensity score weighting (IPW) to balance the two settings on observable patient characteristics. We then compared ED LOS and as well as hospital admission rates and resource utilization rates in the IPW-weighted samples. Results: Before balancing, FSEDs saw more young adults (age 25–44) and fewer older adults (age 45–64) than H-EDs. FSED patients had fewer comorbidities, more injuries and respiratory infections, and fewer diagnoses of chest or abdominal pain. In balanced samples, LOS for FSED visits was 46% shorter (60 minutes) than H-ED patients. Hospital admission rates were 37% lower overall (95% confidence interval = –51% to –23%) in FSEDs and varied considerably by primary discharge diagnosis. X-ray and electrocardiogram use was significantly lower at FSEDs while others measures of resource utilization were similar (ultrasound, computed tomography scans, and laboratory tests). Conclusion: In this sample of FSEDs, a greater proportion of younger patients with fewer comorbidities and more injuries and respiratory system diseases were evaluated, and almost all patients had private health insurance. When restricted to < 65 years, privately insured, and nonambulance patients in both samples, LOS was considerably shorter and hospital admission rates lower at FSEDs, as well as the use of some diagnostic testing. This study is limited as diagnoses codes may not fully capture severity and patients who perceived greater need of hospital admission may have chosen a H-ED over FSEDs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044774388&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044774388&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/acem.13381
DO - 10.1111/acem.13381
M3 - Article
C2 - 29380478
AN - SCOPUS:85044774388
SN - 1069-6563
VL - 25
SP - 538
EP - 550
JO - Academic Emergency Medicine
JF - Academic Emergency Medicine
IS - 5
ER -