A Composite Measure of Caregiver Burden in Dementia: The Dementia Burden Scale—Caregiver

John Devin Peipert*, Lee A. Jennings, Ron D. Hays, Neil S. Wenger, Emmett Keeler, David B. Reuben

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To better capture the scope of caregiver burden by creating a composite of 3 existing measures that assess different health domains. Design: Prospective follow-up study. Setting: University-based dementia care management program. Participants: Caregivers of persons with dementia (PWD) (N=1,091). Measurements: The composite measure (the Dementia Burden Scale—Caregiver (DBS-CG)) was based on the Modified Caregiver Strain Index, Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire Distress Scale, and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Alternative factor structures were evaluated using 2 confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models: a bifactor model and a 3 correlated factors model. Good model fit was defined as a root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) of less than 0.06 and comparative fit index (CFI) value greater than 0.95. Coefficient omega was used to estimate scale reliability. Minimally important differences (MIDs) were estimated by anchoring the magnitude of DBS-CG change to change in caregiver self-efficacy and functional ability of PWD. Results: The bifactor CFA model fit best (RMSEA = 0.04, CFI = 0.95). Based on this model, a DBS-CG scale was created wherein all items were transformed to a possible range of 0 to 100 and then averaged. Higher scores indicate higher burden. Mean DBS-CG score was 27.3. The reliability was excellent (coefficient omega=0.93). MID estimates ranged from 4 to 5 points (effect sizes: 0.20–0.49). Conclusion: This study provides support for the reliability and validity of the DBS-CG. It can be used as an outcome measure to assess the effect of interventions to reduce dementia caregiver burden.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1785-1789
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume66
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Dementia
Statistical Factor Analysis
Aptitude
Health
Self Efficacy
Reproducibility of Results
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's
  • caregiver burden
  • dementia
  • patient-reported outcome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Peipert, John Devin ; Jennings, Lee A. ; Hays, Ron D. ; Wenger, Neil S. ; Keeler, Emmett ; Reuben, David B. / A Composite Measure of Caregiver Burden in Dementia : The Dementia Burden Scale—Caregiver. In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2018 ; Vol. 66, No. 9. pp. 1785-1789.
@article{d7ab17acc88343b3adc0cc6d019d7ec8,
title = "A Composite Measure of Caregiver Burden in Dementia: The Dementia Burden Scale—Caregiver",
abstract = "Objectives: To better capture the scope of caregiver burden by creating a composite of 3 existing measures that assess different health domains. Design: Prospective follow-up study. Setting: University-based dementia care management program. Participants: Caregivers of persons with dementia (PWD) (N=1,091). Measurements: The composite measure (the Dementia Burden Scale—Caregiver (DBS-CG)) was based on the Modified Caregiver Strain Index, Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire Distress Scale, and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Alternative factor structures were evaluated using 2 confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models: a bifactor model and a 3 correlated factors model. Good model fit was defined as a root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) of less than 0.06 and comparative fit index (CFI) value greater than 0.95. Coefficient omega was used to estimate scale reliability. Minimally important differences (MIDs) were estimated by anchoring the magnitude of DBS-CG change to change in caregiver self-efficacy and functional ability of PWD. Results: The bifactor CFA model fit best (RMSEA = 0.04, CFI = 0.95). Based on this model, a DBS-CG scale was created wherein all items were transformed to a possible range of 0 to 100 and then averaged. Higher scores indicate higher burden. Mean DBS-CG score was 27.3. The reliability was excellent (coefficient omega=0.93). MID estimates ranged from 4 to 5 points (effect sizes: 0.20–0.49). Conclusion: This study provides support for the reliability and validity of the DBS-CG. It can be used as an outcome measure to assess the effect of interventions to reduce dementia caregiver burden.",
keywords = "Alzheimer's, caregiver burden, dementia, patient-reported outcome",
author = "Peipert, {John Devin} and Jennings, {Lee A.} and Hays, {Ron D.} and Wenger, {Neil S.} and Emmett Keeler and Reuben, {David B.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jgs.15502",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "1785--1789",
journal = "Journal of the American Geriatrics Society",
issn = "0002-8614",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

A Composite Measure of Caregiver Burden in Dementia : The Dementia Burden Scale—Caregiver. / Peipert, John Devin; Jennings, Lee A.; Hays, Ron D.; Wenger, Neil S.; Keeler, Emmett; Reuben, David B.

In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 66, No. 9, 01.09.2018, p. 1785-1789.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Composite Measure of Caregiver Burden in Dementia

T2 - The Dementia Burden Scale—Caregiver

AU - Peipert, John Devin

AU - Jennings, Lee A.

AU - Hays, Ron D.

AU - Wenger, Neil S.

AU - Keeler, Emmett

AU - Reuben, David B.

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Objectives: To better capture the scope of caregiver burden by creating a composite of 3 existing measures that assess different health domains. Design: Prospective follow-up study. Setting: University-based dementia care management program. Participants: Caregivers of persons with dementia (PWD) (N=1,091). Measurements: The composite measure (the Dementia Burden Scale—Caregiver (DBS-CG)) was based on the Modified Caregiver Strain Index, Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire Distress Scale, and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Alternative factor structures were evaluated using 2 confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models: a bifactor model and a 3 correlated factors model. Good model fit was defined as a root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) of less than 0.06 and comparative fit index (CFI) value greater than 0.95. Coefficient omega was used to estimate scale reliability. Minimally important differences (MIDs) were estimated by anchoring the magnitude of DBS-CG change to change in caregiver self-efficacy and functional ability of PWD. Results: The bifactor CFA model fit best (RMSEA = 0.04, CFI = 0.95). Based on this model, a DBS-CG scale was created wherein all items were transformed to a possible range of 0 to 100 and then averaged. Higher scores indicate higher burden. Mean DBS-CG score was 27.3. The reliability was excellent (coefficient omega=0.93). MID estimates ranged from 4 to 5 points (effect sizes: 0.20–0.49). Conclusion: This study provides support for the reliability and validity of the DBS-CG. It can be used as an outcome measure to assess the effect of interventions to reduce dementia caregiver burden.

AB - Objectives: To better capture the scope of caregiver burden by creating a composite of 3 existing measures that assess different health domains. Design: Prospective follow-up study. Setting: University-based dementia care management program. Participants: Caregivers of persons with dementia (PWD) (N=1,091). Measurements: The composite measure (the Dementia Burden Scale—Caregiver (DBS-CG)) was based on the Modified Caregiver Strain Index, Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire Distress Scale, and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Alternative factor structures were evaluated using 2 confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models: a bifactor model and a 3 correlated factors model. Good model fit was defined as a root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) of less than 0.06 and comparative fit index (CFI) value greater than 0.95. Coefficient omega was used to estimate scale reliability. Minimally important differences (MIDs) were estimated by anchoring the magnitude of DBS-CG change to change in caregiver self-efficacy and functional ability of PWD. Results: The bifactor CFA model fit best (RMSEA = 0.04, CFI = 0.95). Based on this model, a DBS-CG scale was created wherein all items were transformed to a possible range of 0 to 100 and then averaged. Higher scores indicate higher burden. Mean DBS-CG score was 27.3. The reliability was excellent (coefficient omega=0.93). MID estimates ranged from 4 to 5 points (effect sizes: 0.20–0.49). Conclusion: This study provides support for the reliability and validity of the DBS-CG. It can be used as an outcome measure to assess the effect of interventions to reduce dementia caregiver burden.

KW - Alzheimer's

KW - caregiver burden

KW - dementia

KW - patient-reported outcome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052639585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052639585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jgs.15502

DO - 10.1111/jgs.15502

M3 - Article

C2 - 30094817

AN - SCOPUS:85052639585

VL - 66

SP - 1785

EP - 1789

JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

SN - 0002-8614

IS - 9

ER -