A comprehensive review of the impact of tacrolimus intrapatient variability on clinical outcomes in kidney transplantation

Haley M. Gonzales*, John W. McGillicuddy, Vinayak Rohan, Jessica L. Chandler, Satish N. Nadig, Derek A. Dubay, David J. Taber

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

62 Scopus citations

Abstract

Tacrolimus (Tac) is widely used to prevent rejection and graft loss in solid organ transplantation. A limiting characteristic of Tac is the high intra and interpatient variability associated with its use. Routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is necessary to facilitate Tac management and to avoid undesirable clinical outcomes. However, whole blood trough concentrations commonly utilized in TDM are not strong predictors of the detrimental clinical outcomes of interest. Recently, researchers have focused on Tac intrapatient variability (Tac IPV) as a novel marker to better assess patient risk. Higher Tac IPV has been associated with a number of mechanisms leading to shortened graft survival. Medication nonadherence (MNA) is considered to be the primary determinant of high Tac IPV and perhaps the most modifiable risk factor. An understanding of the methodology behind Tac IPV is imperative to its recognition as an important prognostic measure and integration into clinical practice. Therapeutic interventions targeting MNA and reducing Tac IPV are crucial to improving long-term graft survival.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1969-1983
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Journal of Transplantation
Volume20
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2020

Keywords

  • graft survival
  • health services and outcomes research
  • immunosuppressant - calcineurin inhibitor: tacrolimus
  • kidney transplantation/nephrology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Transplantation
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comprehensive review of the impact of tacrolimus intrapatient variability on clinical outcomes in kidney transplantation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this