A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement

Sarah J. Wallace, Linda Worrall, Tanya Rose, Guylaine Le Dorze, Caterina Breitenstein, Katerina Hilari, Edna M Babbitt, Arpita Bose, Marian Brady, Leora R Cherney, David Copland, Madeline Cruice, Pam Enderby, Deborah Hersh, Tami Howe, Helen Kelly, Swathi Kiran, Ann Charlotte Laska, Jane Marshall, Marjorie Nicholas & 7 others Janet Patterson, Gill Pearl, Elizabeth Rochon, Miranda Rose, Karen Sage, Steven Small, Janet Webster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: A core outcome set (COS; an agreed, minimum set of outcomes) was needed to address the heterogeneous measurement of outcomes in aphasia treatment research and to facilitate the production of transparent, meaningful, and efficient outcome data. Objective: The Research Outcome Measurement in Aphasia (ROMA) consensus statement provides evidence-based recommendations for the measurement of outcomes for adults with post-stroke aphasia within phases I–IV aphasia treatment studies. Methods: This statement was informed by a four-year program of research, which comprised investigation of stakeholder-important outcomes using consensus processes, a scoping review of aphasia outcome measurement instruments, and an international consensus meeting. This paper provides an overview of this process and presents the results and recommendations arising from the international consensus meeting. Results: Five essential outcome constructs were identified: Language, communication, patient-reported satisfaction with treatment and impact of treatment, emotional wellbeing, and quality of life. Consensus was reached for the following measurement instruments: Language: The Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WAB-R) (74% consensus); emotional wellbeing: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)-12 (83% consensus); quality of life: Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) (96% consensus). Consensus was unable to be reached for measures of communication (where multiple measures exist) or patient-reported satisfaction with treatment or impact of treatment (where no measures exist). Discussion: Harmonization of the ROMA COS with other core outcome initiatives in stroke rehabilitation is discussed. Ongoing research and consensus processes are outlined. Conclusion: The WAB-R, GHQ-12, and SAQOL-39 are recommended to be routinely included within phases I–IV aphasia treatment studies. This consensus statement has been endorsed by the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists, the British Aphasiology Society, the German Society for Aphasia Research and Therapy, and the Royal College of Speech Language Therapists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)180-185
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Stroke
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

Aphasia
Consensus
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Research
Language
Quality of Life
Therapeutics
Patient Satisfaction
Stroke
Communication
Health

Keywords

  • Aphasia
  • consensus
  • core outcome set
  • methodology
  • recommendations
  • stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology

Cite this

Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., Le Dorze, G., Breitenstein, C., Hilari, K., ... Webster, J. (2019). A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement. International Journal of Stroke, 14(2), 180-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493018806200
Wallace, Sarah J. ; Worrall, Linda ; Rose, Tanya ; Le Dorze, Guylaine ; Breitenstein, Caterina ; Hilari, Katerina ; Babbitt, Edna M ; Bose, Arpita ; Brady, Marian ; Cherney, Leora R ; Copland, David ; Cruice, Madeline ; Enderby, Pam ; Hersh, Deborah ; Howe, Tami ; Kelly, Helen ; Kiran, Swathi ; Laska, Ann Charlotte ; Marshall, Jane ; Nicholas, Marjorie ; Patterson, Janet ; Pearl, Gill ; Rochon, Elizabeth ; Rose, Miranda ; Sage, Karen ; Small, Steven ; Webster, Janet. / A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research : The ROMA consensus statement. In: International Journal of Stroke. 2019 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 180-185.
@article{5235426bbddd495987200032225df0e2,
title = "A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement",
abstract = "Background: A core outcome set (COS; an agreed, minimum set of outcomes) was needed to address the heterogeneous measurement of outcomes in aphasia treatment research and to facilitate the production of transparent, meaningful, and efficient outcome data. Objective: The Research Outcome Measurement in Aphasia (ROMA) consensus statement provides evidence-based recommendations for the measurement of outcomes for adults with post-stroke aphasia within phases I–IV aphasia treatment studies. Methods: This statement was informed by a four-year program of research, which comprised investigation of stakeholder-important outcomes using consensus processes, a scoping review of aphasia outcome measurement instruments, and an international consensus meeting. This paper provides an overview of this process and presents the results and recommendations arising from the international consensus meeting. Results: Five essential outcome constructs were identified: Language, communication, patient-reported satisfaction with treatment and impact of treatment, emotional wellbeing, and quality of life. Consensus was reached for the following measurement instruments: Language: The Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WAB-R) (74{\%} consensus); emotional wellbeing: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)-12 (83{\%} consensus); quality of life: Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) (96{\%} consensus). Consensus was unable to be reached for measures of communication (where multiple measures exist) or patient-reported satisfaction with treatment or impact of treatment (where no measures exist). Discussion: Harmonization of the ROMA COS with other core outcome initiatives in stroke rehabilitation is discussed. Ongoing research and consensus processes are outlined. Conclusion: The WAB-R, GHQ-12, and SAQOL-39 are recommended to be routinely included within phases I–IV aphasia treatment studies. This consensus statement has been endorsed by the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists, the British Aphasiology Society, the German Society for Aphasia Research and Therapy, and the Royal College of Speech Language Therapists.",
keywords = "Aphasia, consensus, core outcome set, methodology, recommendations, stroke",
author = "Wallace, {Sarah J.} and Linda Worrall and Tanya Rose and {Le Dorze}, Guylaine and Caterina Breitenstein and Katerina Hilari and Babbitt, {Edna M} and Arpita Bose and Marian Brady and Cherney, {Leora R} and David Copland and Madeline Cruice and Pam Enderby and Deborah Hersh and Tami Howe and Helen Kelly and Swathi Kiran and Laska, {Ann Charlotte} and Jane Marshall and Marjorie Nicholas and Janet Patterson and Gill Pearl and Elizabeth Rochon and Miranda Rose and Karen Sage and Steven Small and Janet Webster",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1747493018806200",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "180--185",
journal = "International Journal of Stroke",
issn = "1747-4930",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Wallace, SJ, Worrall, L, Rose, T, Le Dorze, G, Breitenstein, C, Hilari, K, Babbitt, EM, Bose, A, Brady, M, Cherney, LR, Copland, D, Cruice, M, Enderby, P, Hersh, D, Howe, T, Kelly, H, Kiran, S, Laska, AC, Marshall, J, Nicholas, M, Patterson, J, Pearl, G, Rochon, E, Rose, M, Sage, K, Small, S & Webster, J 2019, 'A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement' International Journal of Stroke, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 180-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493018806200

A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research : The ROMA consensus statement. / Wallace, Sarah J.; Worrall, Linda; Rose, Tanya; Le Dorze, Guylaine; Breitenstein, Caterina; Hilari, Katerina; Babbitt, Edna M; Bose, Arpita; Brady, Marian; Cherney, Leora R; Copland, David; Cruice, Madeline; Enderby, Pam; Hersh, Deborah; Howe, Tami; Kelly, Helen; Kiran, Swathi; Laska, Ann Charlotte; Marshall, Jane; Nicholas, Marjorie; Patterson, Janet; Pearl, Gill; Rochon, Elizabeth; Rose, Miranda; Sage, Karen; Small, Steven; Webster, Janet.

In: International Journal of Stroke, Vol. 14, No. 2, 01.02.2019, p. 180-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research

T2 - The ROMA consensus statement

AU - Wallace, Sarah J.

AU - Worrall, Linda

AU - Rose, Tanya

AU - Le Dorze, Guylaine

AU - Breitenstein, Caterina

AU - Hilari, Katerina

AU - Babbitt, Edna M

AU - Bose, Arpita

AU - Brady, Marian

AU - Cherney, Leora R

AU - Copland, David

AU - Cruice, Madeline

AU - Enderby, Pam

AU - Hersh, Deborah

AU - Howe, Tami

AU - Kelly, Helen

AU - Kiran, Swathi

AU - Laska, Ann Charlotte

AU - Marshall, Jane

AU - Nicholas, Marjorie

AU - Patterson, Janet

AU - Pearl, Gill

AU - Rochon, Elizabeth

AU - Rose, Miranda

AU - Sage, Karen

AU - Small, Steven

AU - Webster, Janet

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Background: A core outcome set (COS; an agreed, minimum set of outcomes) was needed to address the heterogeneous measurement of outcomes in aphasia treatment research and to facilitate the production of transparent, meaningful, and efficient outcome data. Objective: The Research Outcome Measurement in Aphasia (ROMA) consensus statement provides evidence-based recommendations for the measurement of outcomes for adults with post-stroke aphasia within phases I–IV aphasia treatment studies. Methods: This statement was informed by a four-year program of research, which comprised investigation of stakeholder-important outcomes using consensus processes, a scoping review of aphasia outcome measurement instruments, and an international consensus meeting. This paper provides an overview of this process and presents the results and recommendations arising from the international consensus meeting. Results: Five essential outcome constructs were identified: Language, communication, patient-reported satisfaction with treatment and impact of treatment, emotional wellbeing, and quality of life. Consensus was reached for the following measurement instruments: Language: The Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WAB-R) (74% consensus); emotional wellbeing: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)-12 (83% consensus); quality of life: Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) (96% consensus). Consensus was unable to be reached for measures of communication (where multiple measures exist) or patient-reported satisfaction with treatment or impact of treatment (where no measures exist). Discussion: Harmonization of the ROMA COS with other core outcome initiatives in stroke rehabilitation is discussed. Ongoing research and consensus processes are outlined. Conclusion: The WAB-R, GHQ-12, and SAQOL-39 are recommended to be routinely included within phases I–IV aphasia treatment studies. This consensus statement has been endorsed by the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists, the British Aphasiology Society, the German Society for Aphasia Research and Therapy, and the Royal College of Speech Language Therapists.

AB - Background: A core outcome set (COS; an agreed, minimum set of outcomes) was needed to address the heterogeneous measurement of outcomes in aphasia treatment research and to facilitate the production of transparent, meaningful, and efficient outcome data. Objective: The Research Outcome Measurement in Aphasia (ROMA) consensus statement provides evidence-based recommendations for the measurement of outcomes for adults with post-stroke aphasia within phases I–IV aphasia treatment studies. Methods: This statement was informed by a four-year program of research, which comprised investigation of stakeholder-important outcomes using consensus processes, a scoping review of aphasia outcome measurement instruments, and an international consensus meeting. This paper provides an overview of this process and presents the results and recommendations arising from the international consensus meeting. Results: Five essential outcome constructs were identified: Language, communication, patient-reported satisfaction with treatment and impact of treatment, emotional wellbeing, and quality of life. Consensus was reached for the following measurement instruments: Language: The Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WAB-R) (74% consensus); emotional wellbeing: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)-12 (83% consensus); quality of life: Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) (96% consensus). Consensus was unable to be reached for measures of communication (where multiple measures exist) or patient-reported satisfaction with treatment or impact of treatment (where no measures exist). Discussion: Harmonization of the ROMA COS with other core outcome initiatives in stroke rehabilitation is discussed. Ongoing research and consensus processes are outlined. Conclusion: The WAB-R, GHQ-12, and SAQOL-39 are recommended to be routinely included within phases I–IV aphasia treatment studies. This consensus statement has been endorsed by the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists, the British Aphasiology Society, the German Society for Aphasia Research and Therapy, and the Royal College of Speech Language Therapists.

KW - Aphasia

KW - consensus

KW - core outcome set

KW - methodology

KW - recommendations

KW - stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059623959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059623959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1747493018806200

DO - 10.1177/1747493018806200

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 180

EP - 185

JO - International Journal of Stroke

JF - International Journal of Stroke

SN - 1747-4930

IS - 2

ER -

Wallace SJ, Worrall L, Rose T, Le Dorze G, Breitenstein C, Hilari K et al. A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement. International Journal of Stroke. 2019 Feb 1;14(2):180-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493018806200