TY - JOUR
T1 - A Decision Instrument to Identify Isolated Traumatic Subdural Hematomas at Low Risk of Neurologic Deterioration, Surgical Intervention, or Radiographic Worsening
AU - Pruitt, Peter
AU - Ornam, Jonathan Van
AU - Borczuk, Pierre
N1 - Funding Information:
From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine (PP), Chicago, IL; Harvard Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency (JVO), Boston, MA; the Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital (JVO, PB), Boston, MA; and the Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School (JVO, PB), Boston, MA. Received June 14, 2017; revision received August 18, 2017; accepted August 27, 2017. Presented at the American College of Emergency Physicians Research Forum, Las Vegas, NV, October 2016. Dr. Pruitt is a National Research Service Award postdoctoral fellow supported by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) T-32 HS 000078 (PI: Jane L. Holl, MD, MPH). AHRQ was not involved in the design or execution of this research. The authors have no relevant financial information or potential conflicts to disclose. Author contributions: PB and PP conceived of the study and designed the review process; PB, JO, and PP participated in the abstraction and coding of data; PP and PB performed the data analysis; PP drafted the manuscript and all authors contributed substantially to its revision; and PP takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. Supervising Editor: Peter D. Panagos, MD. Address for correspondence and reprints: Peter Pruitt; e-mail: peter.pruitt@northwestern.edu. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2017;24:1377–1386.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - Objectives: Subdural hematoma (SDH) is the most common form of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Severity of disease in patients with SDH varies widely. It was hypothesized that a decision rule could identify patients with SDH who are at very low risk for neurologic decline, neurosurgical intervention, or radiographic worsening. Methods: Retrospective chart review of consecutive patients age ≥ 16 with Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≥ 13 and computed tomography (CT)-documented isolated SDH presenting to a university-affiliated, urban, 100,000-annual-visit ED from 2009 to 2015. Demographic, historical, and physical examination variables were collected. Primary outcome was a composite of neurosurgical intervention, worsening repeat CT, and neurologic decline. Univariate analysis was performed and statistically important variables were utilized to create a logistic regression model. Results: A total of 644 patients with isolated SDH were reviewed, 340 in the derivation group and 304 in the validation set. Mortality was 2.2%. A total 15.5% of patients required neurosurgery. A decision instrument was created: patients were low risk if they had none of the following factors—SDH thickness ≥ 5mm, warfarin use, clopidogrel use, GCS < 14, and presence of midline shift. This model had a sensitivity of 98.6% for the composite endpoint, specificity of 37.1%, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.037. In the validation cohort, sensitivity was 96.3%, specificity was 31.5%, and negative likelihood ratio was 0.127. Conclusion: Subdural hematomas are amenable to risk stratification analysis. With prospective validation, this decision instrument may aid in triaging these patients, including reducing the need for transfer to tertiary centers.
AB - Objectives: Subdural hematoma (SDH) is the most common form of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Severity of disease in patients with SDH varies widely. It was hypothesized that a decision rule could identify patients with SDH who are at very low risk for neurologic decline, neurosurgical intervention, or radiographic worsening. Methods: Retrospective chart review of consecutive patients age ≥ 16 with Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≥ 13 and computed tomography (CT)-documented isolated SDH presenting to a university-affiliated, urban, 100,000-annual-visit ED from 2009 to 2015. Demographic, historical, and physical examination variables were collected. Primary outcome was a composite of neurosurgical intervention, worsening repeat CT, and neurologic decline. Univariate analysis was performed and statistically important variables were utilized to create a logistic regression model. Results: A total of 644 patients with isolated SDH were reviewed, 340 in the derivation group and 304 in the validation set. Mortality was 2.2%. A total 15.5% of patients required neurosurgery. A decision instrument was created: patients were low risk if they had none of the following factors—SDH thickness ≥ 5mm, warfarin use, clopidogrel use, GCS < 14, and presence of midline shift. This model had a sensitivity of 98.6% for the composite endpoint, specificity of 37.1%, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.037. In the validation cohort, sensitivity was 96.3%, specificity was 31.5%, and negative likelihood ratio was 0.127. Conclusion: Subdural hematomas are amenable to risk stratification analysis. With prospective validation, this decision instrument may aid in triaging these patients, including reducing the need for transfer to tertiary centers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033496794&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033496794&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/acem.13306
DO - 10.1111/acem.13306
M3 - Article
C2 - 28871614
AN - SCOPUS:85033496794
SN - 1069-6563
VL - 24
SP - 1377
EP - 1386
JO - Academic Emergency Medicine
JF - Academic Emergency Medicine
IS - 11
ER -