A generalized reward processing deficit pathway to negative symptoms across diagnostic boundaries

Michael J. Spilka, Zachary B. Millman, James A. Waltz, Elaine F. Walker, Jason A. Levin, Albert R. Powers, Philip R. Corlett, Jason Schiffman, James M. Gold, Steven M. Silverstein, Lauren M. Ellman, Vijay A. Mittal, Scott W. Woods, Richard Zinbarg, Gregory P. Strauss*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background Negative symptoms are a key feature of several psychiatric disorders. Difficulty identifying common neurobiological mechanisms that cut across diagnostic boundaries might result from equifinality (i.e., multiple mechanistic pathways to the same clinical profile), both within and across disorders. This study used a data-driven approach to identify unique subgroups of participants with distinct reward processing profiles to determine which profiles predicted negative symptoms. Methods Participants were a transdiagnostic sample of youth from a multisite study of psychosis risk, including 110 individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR; meeting psychosis-risk syndrome criteria), 88 help-seeking participants who failed to meet CHR criteria and/or who presented with other psychiatric diagnoses, and a reference group of 66 healthy controls. Participants completed clinical interviews and behavioral tasks assessing four reward processing constructs indexed by the RDoC Positive Valence Systems: hedonic reactivity, reinforcement learning, value representation, and effort-cost computation. Results k-means cluster analysis of clinical participants identified three subgroups with distinct reward processing profiles, primarily characterized by: a value representation deficit (54%), a generalized reward processing deficit (17%), and a hedonic reactivity deficit (29%). Clusters did not differ in rates of clinical group membership or psychiatric diagnoses. Elevated negative symptoms were only present in the generalized deficit cluster, which also displayed greater functional impairment and higher psychosis conversion probability scores. Conclusions Contrary to the equifinality hypothesis, results suggested one global reward processing deficit pathway to negative symptoms independent of diagnostic classification. Assessment of reward processing profiles may have utility for individualized clinical prediction and treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere6
JournalPsychological Medicine
Volume55
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 4 2025

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health: R01MH120088 (Mittal), R01MH120089 (Corlett, Woods), R01MH120090 (Gold), R01MH120091 (Ellman), R01MH120092 (Strauss), R01MH115031 (Waltz), and T32MH016259 (Millman).

Keywords

  • clinical high-risk
  • equifinality
  • negative symptoms
  • psychosis
  • reward
  • transdiagnostic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A generalized reward processing deficit pathway to negative symptoms across diagnostic boundaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this