A history of meta-regression: Technical, conceptual, and practical developments between 1974 and 2018

Elizabeth Tipton*, James E. Pustejovsky, Hedyeh Ahmadi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

At the beginning of the development of meta-analysis, understanding the role of moderators was given the highest priority, with meta-regression provided as a method for achieving this goal. Yet in current practice, meta-regression is not as commonly used as anticipated. This paper seeks to understand this mismatch by reviewing the history of meta-regression methods over the past 40 years. We divide this time span into four periods and examine three types of methodological developments within each period: technical, conceptual, and practical. Our focus is broad and includes development of methods in the fields of education, psychology, and medicine. We conclude the paper with a discussion of five consensus points, as well as open questions and areas of research for the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-179
Number of pages19
JournalResearch synthesis methods
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

regression
history
development of methods
moderator
mismatch
psychology
medicine
education
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

@article{5fccd33c7c944ee1b43d7aca5a526163,
title = "A history of meta-regression: Technical, conceptual, and practical developments between 1974 and 2018",
abstract = "At the beginning of the development of meta-analysis, understanding the role of moderators was given the highest priority, with meta-regression provided as a method for achieving this goal. Yet in current practice, meta-regression is not as commonly used as anticipated. This paper seeks to understand this mismatch by reviewing the history of meta-regression methods over the past 40 years. We divide this time span into four periods and examine three types of methodological developments within each period: technical, conceptual, and practical. Our focus is broad and includes development of methods in the fields of education, psychology, and medicine. We conclude the paper with a discussion of five consensus points, as well as open questions and areas of research for the future.",
author = "Elizabeth Tipton and Pustejovsky, {James E.} and Hedyeh Ahmadi",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jrsm.1338",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "161--179",
journal = "Research Synthesis Methods",
issn = "1759-2879",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

A history of meta-regression : Technical, conceptual, and practical developments between 1974 and 2018. / Tipton, Elizabeth; Pustejovsky, James E.; Ahmadi, Hedyeh.

In: Research synthesis methods, Vol. 10, No. 2, 01.06.2019, p. 161-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A history of meta-regression

T2 - Technical, conceptual, and practical developments between 1974 and 2018

AU - Tipton, Elizabeth

AU - Pustejovsky, James E.

AU - Ahmadi, Hedyeh

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - At the beginning of the development of meta-analysis, understanding the role of moderators was given the highest priority, with meta-regression provided as a method for achieving this goal. Yet in current practice, meta-regression is not as commonly used as anticipated. This paper seeks to understand this mismatch by reviewing the history of meta-regression methods over the past 40 years. We divide this time span into four periods and examine three types of methodological developments within each period: technical, conceptual, and practical. Our focus is broad and includes development of methods in the fields of education, psychology, and medicine. We conclude the paper with a discussion of five consensus points, as well as open questions and areas of research for the future.

AB - At the beginning of the development of meta-analysis, understanding the role of moderators was given the highest priority, with meta-regression provided as a method for achieving this goal. Yet in current practice, meta-regression is not as commonly used as anticipated. This paper seeks to understand this mismatch by reviewing the history of meta-regression methods over the past 40 years. We divide this time span into four periods and examine three types of methodological developments within each period: technical, conceptual, and practical. Our focus is broad and includes development of methods in the fields of education, psychology, and medicine. We conclude the paper with a discussion of five consensus points, as well as open questions and areas of research for the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066956521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066956521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jrsm.1338

DO - 10.1002/jrsm.1338

M3 - Article

C2 - 30589224

AN - SCOPUS:85066956521

VL - 10

SP - 161

EP - 179

JO - Research Synthesis Methods

JF - Research Synthesis Methods

SN - 1759-2879

IS - 2

ER -