Abstract
Background: Ruxolitinib cream has demonstrated anti-inflammatory and antipruritic activity and was well tolerated in a phase 3 study in patients aged 2–11 years with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (AD). Objective: This study examined the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and quality of life (QoL) with ruxolitinib cream under maximum-use conditions and with longer-term use. Methods: Eligible patients were aged 2–11 years with moderate to severe AD [Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score 3–4], and ≥ 35% affected body surface area (BSA). Patients applied 1.5% ruxolitinib cream twice daily to all baseline-identified lesions during the 4-week maximum-use period, then to active lesions only up to week 52 (patients with ≤ 20% affected BSA from week 8). Safety was assessed by frequency and severity of adverse events. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed as secondary endpoints, and efficacy and QoL were exploratory endpoints. Results: Overall, 29 patients (median age 5 years) were enrolled. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 9/29 patients (31.0%); there were no adverse events of special interest (i.e., no serious infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, or thromboses) during the study period. Mean steady-state plasma concentration during the maximum-use period was below the known half-maximal inhibitory concentration of Janus kinase–mediated myelosuppression in adults. Reductions in affected BSA and IGA observed at week 4 were sustained with as-needed use through 52 weeks. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes and QoL measures were consistent with efficacy results. Conclusion: These results support the safety of ruxolitinib cream in children (2–11 years) with AD, including those with extensive disease, and are consistent with previous efficacy findings. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05034822, first registered 30 August 2021.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 275-289 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | American Journal of Clinical Dermatology |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2025 |
Funding
This study was funded by Incyte Corporation (Wilmington, DE, USA). The authors would like to thank Daniel Sturm, PharmD, of Incyte, for his critical review of this manuscript. Writing assistance was provided by Lee Hohaia, PharmD, of ICON (Blue Bell, PA, USA), and was funded by Incyte.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Dermatology