A Measurement Model for Dignity, Face, and Honor Cultural Norms

Jingjing Yao*, Jimena Ramirez-Marin, Jeanne Brett, Soroush Aslani, Zhaleh Semnani-Azad

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this work we develop and validate a model measuring norms that distinguish three types of culture: dignity, face, and honor (Leung & Cohen, 2011). Our motivation is to produce empirical evidence for this new cultural framework and use the framework to explain cultural differences in interdependent social interactions such as negotiation. In two studies, we establish the content validity, construct validity, predictive validity, and measurement invariance of this measurement model. In Study 1, we present the model's three-factor structure and situate the constructs of dignity, face, and honor in a nomological network of cultural constructs. In Study 2, which uses a sample of participants from 26 cultures, we show that the measurement model discriminates among people from the three cultural regions corresponding to the dignity, face, and honor framework. In particular, we report differences between face and honor cultures, which are not distinguished in other cultural frameworks (e.g., Hofstede, 1980). We also show that the measurement model accounts for cultural differences in norms for use of negotiation strategy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)713-738
Number of pages26
JournalManagement and Organization Review
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Dignity
Measurement model
Cultural differences
Construct validity
Social interaction
Content validity
Predictive validity
Fama-French three-factor model
Hofstede
Empirical evidence
Negotiation strategy
Measurement invariance

Keywords

  • dignity
  • face
  • honor
  • negotiation strategy
  • norms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Yao, Jingjing ; Ramirez-Marin, Jimena ; Brett, Jeanne ; Aslani, Soroush ; Semnani-Azad, Zhaleh. / A Measurement Model for Dignity, Face, and Honor Cultural Norms. In: Management and Organization Review. 2017 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 713-738.
@article{886907cf9ecf4205a8bd48aaa43a0337,
title = "A Measurement Model for Dignity, Face, and Honor Cultural Norms",
abstract = "In this work we develop and validate a model measuring norms that distinguish three types of culture: dignity, face, and honor (Leung & Cohen, 2011). Our motivation is to produce empirical evidence for this new cultural framework and use the framework to explain cultural differences in interdependent social interactions such as negotiation. In two studies, we establish the content validity, construct validity, predictive validity, and measurement invariance of this measurement model. In Study 1, we present the model's three-factor structure and situate the constructs of dignity, face, and honor in a nomological network of cultural constructs. In Study 2, which uses a sample of participants from 26 cultures, we show that the measurement model discriminates among people from the three cultural regions corresponding to the dignity, face, and honor framework. In particular, we report differences between face and honor cultures, which are not distinguished in other cultural frameworks (e.g., Hofstede, 1980). We also show that the measurement model accounts for cultural differences in norms for use of negotiation strategy.",
keywords = "dignity, face, honor, negotiation strategy, norms",
author = "Jingjing Yao and Jimena Ramirez-Marin and Jeanne Brett and Soroush Aslani and Zhaleh Semnani-Azad",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/mor.2017.49",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "713--738",
journal = "Management and Organization Review",
issn = "1740-8776",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

Yao, J, Ramirez-Marin, J, Brett, J, Aslani, S & Semnani-Azad, Z 2017, 'A Measurement Model for Dignity, Face, and Honor Cultural Norms', Management and Organization Review, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 713-738. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2017.49

A Measurement Model for Dignity, Face, and Honor Cultural Norms. / Yao, Jingjing; Ramirez-Marin, Jimena; Brett, Jeanne; Aslani, Soroush; Semnani-Azad, Zhaleh.

In: Management and Organization Review, Vol. 13, No. 4, 01.12.2017, p. 713-738.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Measurement Model for Dignity, Face, and Honor Cultural Norms

AU - Yao, Jingjing

AU - Ramirez-Marin, Jimena

AU - Brett, Jeanne

AU - Aslani, Soroush

AU - Semnani-Azad, Zhaleh

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - In this work we develop and validate a model measuring norms that distinguish three types of culture: dignity, face, and honor (Leung & Cohen, 2011). Our motivation is to produce empirical evidence for this new cultural framework and use the framework to explain cultural differences in interdependent social interactions such as negotiation. In two studies, we establish the content validity, construct validity, predictive validity, and measurement invariance of this measurement model. In Study 1, we present the model's three-factor structure and situate the constructs of dignity, face, and honor in a nomological network of cultural constructs. In Study 2, which uses a sample of participants from 26 cultures, we show that the measurement model discriminates among people from the three cultural regions corresponding to the dignity, face, and honor framework. In particular, we report differences between face and honor cultures, which are not distinguished in other cultural frameworks (e.g., Hofstede, 1980). We also show that the measurement model accounts for cultural differences in norms for use of negotiation strategy.

AB - In this work we develop and validate a model measuring norms that distinguish three types of culture: dignity, face, and honor (Leung & Cohen, 2011). Our motivation is to produce empirical evidence for this new cultural framework and use the framework to explain cultural differences in interdependent social interactions such as negotiation. In two studies, we establish the content validity, construct validity, predictive validity, and measurement invariance of this measurement model. In Study 1, we present the model's three-factor structure and situate the constructs of dignity, face, and honor in a nomological network of cultural constructs. In Study 2, which uses a sample of participants from 26 cultures, we show that the measurement model discriminates among people from the three cultural regions corresponding to the dignity, face, and honor framework. In particular, we report differences between face and honor cultures, which are not distinguished in other cultural frameworks (e.g., Hofstede, 1980). We also show that the measurement model accounts for cultural differences in norms for use of negotiation strategy.

KW - dignity

KW - face

KW - honor

KW - negotiation strategy

KW - norms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039964152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039964152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/mor.2017.49

DO - 10.1017/mor.2017.49

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 713

EP - 738

JO - Management and Organization Review

JF - Management and Organization Review

SN - 1740-8776

IS - 4

ER -