TY - JOUR
T1 - A Measurement Model for Dignity, Face, and Honor Cultural Norms
AU - Yao, Jingjing
AU - Ramirez-Marin, Jimena
AU - Brett, Jeanne
AU - Aslani, Soroush
AU - Semnani-Azad, Zhaleh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2017.
PY - 2017/12/1
Y1 - 2017/12/1
N2 - In this work we develop and validate a model measuring norms that distinguish three types of culture: dignity, face, and honor (Leung & Cohen, 2011). Our motivation is to produce empirical evidence for this new cultural framework and use the framework to explain cultural differences in interdependent social interactions such as negotiation. In two studies, we establish the content validity, construct validity, predictive validity, and measurement invariance of this measurement model. In Study 1, we present the model's three-factor structure and situate the constructs of dignity, face, and honor in a nomological network of cultural constructs. In Study 2, which uses a sample of participants from 26 cultures, we show that the measurement model discriminates among people from the three cultural regions corresponding to the dignity, face, and honor framework. In particular, we report differences between face and honor cultures, which are not distinguished in other cultural frameworks (e.g., Hofstede, 1980). We also show that the measurement model accounts for cultural differences in norms for use of negotiation strategy.
AB - In this work we develop and validate a model measuring norms that distinguish three types of culture: dignity, face, and honor (Leung & Cohen, 2011). Our motivation is to produce empirical evidence for this new cultural framework and use the framework to explain cultural differences in interdependent social interactions such as negotiation. In two studies, we establish the content validity, construct validity, predictive validity, and measurement invariance of this measurement model. In Study 1, we present the model's three-factor structure and situate the constructs of dignity, face, and honor in a nomological network of cultural constructs. In Study 2, which uses a sample of participants from 26 cultures, we show that the measurement model discriminates among people from the three cultural regions corresponding to the dignity, face, and honor framework. In particular, we report differences between face and honor cultures, which are not distinguished in other cultural frameworks (e.g., Hofstede, 1980). We also show that the measurement model accounts for cultural differences in norms for use of negotiation strategy.
KW - dignity
KW - face
KW - honor
KW - negotiation strategy
KW - norms
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039964152&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039964152&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/mor.2017.49
DO - 10.1017/mor.2017.49
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85039964152
SN - 1740-8776
VL - 13
SP - 713
EP - 738
JO - Management and Organization Review
JF - Management and Organization Review
IS - 4
ER -