TY - JOUR
T1 - A Multisite Study of Interprofessional Teamwork and Collaboration on General Medical Services
AU - O'Leary, Kevin J.
AU - Manojlovich, Milisa
AU - Johnson, Julie Karen
AU - Estrella, Ronald
AU - Hanrahan, Krystal
AU - Leykum, Luci K.
AU - Smith, G. Randy
AU - Goldstein, Jenna D.
AU - Williams, Mark V.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Joint Commission
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Background: Teamwork and collaboration are essential to providing high-quality care. Prior research has found discrepancies between nurses’ and physicians’ perceptions in operating rooms, ICUs, and labor and delivery units. Less is known about health care professionals’ perceptions of teamwork and collaboration on general medical services. Methods: This cross-sectional study included nurses, nurse assistants, and physicians working on general medical services in four mid-sized hospitals. Researchers assessed teamwork climate using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire and asked respondents to rate the quality of collaboration experienced with their own and other professional categories. Results: Data for 380 participants (80 hospitalists, 13 resident physicians, 193 nurses, and 94 nurse assistants) were analyzed. Hospitalists had the highest median teamwork climate score (83.3, interquartile range [IQR] = 72.3–91.1), and nurses had the lowest (78.6, IQR = 69.6–87.5), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.42). Median teamwork climate scores were significantly different across the four sites (highest = 83.3, IQR = 75.0–91.1; lowest = 76.8, IQR = 66.7–88.4; p = 0.003). Ratings of the quality of collaboration differed significantly based on professional category. Specifically, 63.3% (50/79) of hospitalists rated the quality of collaboration with nurses as high or very high, while 48.7% (94/193) of nurses rated the quality of collaboration with hospitalists as high or very high. Conclusion: This study found significant differences in perceptions of teamwork climate across sites and in collaboration across professional categories on general medical services. Given the importance in providing high-quality care, leaders should consider conducting similar assessments to characterize teamwork and collaboration on general medical services within their own hospitals.
AB - Background: Teamwork and collaboration are essential to providing high-quality care. Prior research has found discrepancies between nurses’ and physicians’ perceptions in operating rooms, ICUs, and labor and delivery units. Less is known about health care professionals’ perceptions of teamwork and collaboration on general medical services. Methods: This cross-sectional study included nurses, nurse assistants, and physicians working on general medical services in four mid-sized hospitals. Researchers assessed teamwork climate using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire and asked respondents to rate the quality of collaboration experienced with their own and other professional categories. Results: Data for 380 participants (80 hospitalists, 13 resident physicians, 193 nurses, and 94 nurse assistants) were analyzed. Hospitalists had the highest median teamwork climate score (83.3, interquartile range [IQR] = 72.3–91.1), and nurses had the lowest (78.6, IQR = 69.6–87.5), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.42). Median teamwork climate scores were significantly different across the four sites (highest = 83.3, IQR = 75.0–91.1; lowest = 76.8, IQR = 66.7–88.4; p = 0.003). Ratings of the quality of collaboration differed significantly based on professional category. Specifically, 63.3% (50/79) of hospitalists rated the quality of collaboration with nurses as high or very high, while 48.7% (94/193) of nurses rated the quality of collaboration with hospitalists as high or very high. Conclusion: This study found significant differences in perceptions of teamwork climate across sites and in collaboration across professional categories on general medical services. Given the importance in providing high-quality care, leaders should consider conducting similar assessments to characterize teamwork and collaboration on general medical services within their own hospitals.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092011757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092011757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.09.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.09.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 33228852
AN - SCOPUS:85092011757
SN - 1553-7250
VL - 46
SP - 667
EP - 672
JO - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
JF - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
IS - 12
ER -