TY - JOUR
T1 - A narrative review of the published literature, hospital practices, and policies related to external ventricular drains in the United States
T2 - The external ventricular drain publications, practices, and policies (EVDPoP) study
AU - the EVDPoP Study Collaborators
AU - Thamjamrassri, Thanyalak
AU - Yuwapattanawong, Kornkamon
AU - Chanthima, Phuriphong
AU - Vavilala, Monica S.
AU - Lele, Abhijit V.
AU - Abramowicz, Elisabeth
AU - Athiraman, Umeshkumar
AU - Avitsian, Rafi
AU - Bebawy, John F.
AU - Bustillo, Maria
AU - Chen, Charlene
AU - Gollapudy, Suneeta
AU - Kornbluth, Joshua
AU - Mathews, Letha
AU - Merenda, Amedeo
AU - McDonagh, David L.
AU - Moheet, Asma
AU - Naik, Bhiken
AU - O'Hana Nobleza, Christa
AU - Paisansathan, Chanannait
AU - Palmieri, Katherine
AU - Rao, Shyam
AU - Roberts, Debra
AU - Rosenblatt, Kathryn
AU - Olm-Shipman, Casey
AU - Schloemerkemper, Nina
AU - Shutter, Lori A.
AU - Vagnerova, Kamila
AU - Williams, James
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - External ventricular drain (EVD) placement and management pose risks to neurocritically ill patients. Yet, little is known about EVD management or hospital EVD management practices and policies in US hospitals. A narrative review was conducted to describe EVD-related publications reported in PubMed and Embase between 1953 and 2019, and a survey was used to examine US hospital EVD practices and policies, including adherence to EVD guideline recommendations. Overall, 912 relevant articles were published between 1953 and 2019 (average 21; range, 0 to 102 articles, per year), primarily related to indications for EVD placement (n = 275, 30.2%), EVD-associated complications (n = 206, 22.6%), and EVD care (n = 200, 21.9%). The number of EVD publications increased over time (R2 = 0.7), and most publications addressed EVD-associated infection (n = 296, 73.4%) and EVD insertion (n = 195, 45.2%). Survey responses were received from 30 hospitals (37.5% response rate), and reported use of antimicrobial-impregnated catheters in 80% of hospitals, preinsertion antibiotic administration in 70%, collection of cerebrospinal fluid samples for suspicion of ventriculitis in 73.3%, tracking of EVD-associated infection in 86.7%, routine EVD clamping during transport in 66.7%, and monitoring of intracranial pressure during transport in 33.3%. Adherence to hospital policies was high for recommendations related to flushing an EVD and changing cerebrospinal fluid drainage systems (100% [range, 0% to 100%] each), but low for intrahospital transportation (16.7% [0% to 83.3%]), EVD removal (0% [0% to 66.7%]), patient and family education (0% [0% to 100%]), and administration of intraventricular medication (0% [0% to 100%]). In summary, the published literature related to EVD insertion and maintenance, and reported EVD hospital practices and policies, primarily focus on reducing EVD-associated infections. Still, overall adherence of hospital EVD policies to guideline recommendations is modest. To promote a culture of EVD safety, clinicians should focus on reducing all EVD-associated adverse events.
AB - External ventricular drain (EVD) placement and management pose risks to neurocritically ill patients. Yet, little is known about EVD management or hospital EVD management practices and policies in US hospitals. A narrative review was conducted to describe EVD-related publications reported in PubMed and Embase between 1953 and 2019, and a survey was used to examine US hospital EVD practices and policies, including adherence to EVD guideline recommendations. Overall, 912 relevant articles were published between 1953 and 2019 (average 21; range, 0 to 102 articles, per year), primarily related to indications for EVD placement (n = 275, 30.2%), EVD-associated complications (n = 206, 22.6%), and EVD care (n = 200, 21.9%). The number of EVD publications increased over time (R2 = 0.7), and most publications addressed EVD-associated infection (n = 296, 73.4%) and EVD insertion (n = 195, 45.2%). Survey responses were received from 30 hospitals (37.5% response rate), and reported use of antimicrobial-impregnated catheters in 80% of hospitals, preinsertion antibiotic administration in 70%, collection of cerebrospinal fluid samples for suspicion of ventriculitis in 73.3%, tracking of EVD-associated infection in 86.7%, routine EVD clamping during transport in 66.7%, and monitoring of intracranial pressure during transport in 33.3%. Adherence to hospital policies was high for recommendations related to flushing an EVD and changing cerebrospinal fluid drainage systems (100% [range, 0% to 100%] each), but low for intrahospital transportation (16.7% [0% to 83.3%]), EVD removal (0% [0% to 66.7%]), patient and family education (0% [0% to 100%]), and administration of intraventricular medication (0% [0% to 100%]). In summary, the published literature related to EVD insertion and maintenance, and reported EVD hospital practices and policies, primarily focus on reducing EVD-associated infections. Still, overall adherence of hospital EVD policies to guideline recommendations is modest. To promote a culture of EVD safety, clinicians should focus on reducing all EVD-associated adverse events.
KW - External ventricular drain
KW - Insertion
KW - Maintenance
KW - Policy
KW - Protocols
KW - United States
KW - Ventriculostomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112464371&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85112464371&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000694
DO - 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000694
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32467476
AN - SCOPUS:85112464371
SN - 0898-4921
VL - 34
SP - 21
EP - 28
JO - Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology
JF - Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology
IS - 1
ER -