A National Survey of Mentoring Programs for KL2 Scholars

Karin A. Silet, Pamela Asquith, Michael F. Fleming*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

There is limited information on how academic institutions support effective mentoring practices for new investigators. A national semistructured telephone interview was conducted to assess current "state of the art" mentoring practices for KL2 scholars among the 46 institutions participating in the Clinical Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Consortium. Mentoring practices examined included: mentor selection, articulating and aligning expectations, assessing the mentoring relationship, and mentor training. Telephone interviews were conducted in winter/fall 2009, with 100% of the CTSAs funded (n= 46) through 2009, participating in the survey. Primary findings include: five programs selected mentors for K scholars, 14 programs used mentor contracts to define expectations, 16 programs reported formal mentor evaluation, 10 offered financial incentives to mentors, and 13 offered formal mentoring training. The interviews found considerable variation in mentoring practices for training new investigators among the 46 CTSAs. There was also limited consensus on "what works" and what are the core elements of "effective mentoring practices. Empirical research is needed to help research leaders decide on where and how to place resources related to mentoring. Clin Trans Sci 2010; Volume 3: 299-304.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)299-304
Number of pages6
JournalClinical and Translational Science
Volume3
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010

Keywords

  • Clinical and translational research
  • Mentoring
  • Training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A National Survey of Mentoring Programs for KL2 Scholars'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this