TY - JOUR
T1 - A nationwide analysis of 30-day readmissions related to critical limb ischemia
AU - Masoomi, Reza
AU - Shah, Zubair
AU - Quint, Clay
AU - Hance, Kirk
AU - Vamanan, Karthik
AU - Prasad, Anand
AU - Hoel, Andrew
AU - Dawn, Buddhadeb
AU - Gupta, Kamal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.
PY - 2018/6/1
Y1 - 2018/6/1
N2 - Objectives: There is paucity of information regarding critical limb ischemia-related readmission rates in patients admitted with critical limb ischemia. We studied 30-day critical limb ischemia-related readmission rate, its predictors, and clinical outcomes using a nationwide real-world dataset. Methods: We did a secondary analysis of the 2013 Nationwide Readmissions Database. We included all patients with a primary diagnosis of extremity rest pain, ulceration, and gangrene secondary to peripheral arterial disease. From this group, all patients readmitted with similar diagnosis within 30 days were recorded. Results: Of the total 25,111 index hospitalization for critical limb ischemia, 1270 (5%) were readmitted with a primary diagnosis of critical limb ischemia within 30 days. The readmission rate was highest (9.5%) for the group that did not have any intervention (revascularization or major amputation) and was lowest for surgical revascularization and major amputation groups (2.6% and 1.3%, P value <0.001 for all groups). Severity of critical limb ischemia at index admission was associated with a significantly higher rate of 30-day readmission. Critical limb ischemia-related readmission was associated with a higher rate of major amputation (29.6% vs. 16.2%, P<0.001), a lower rate of any revascularization procedure (46% vs. 62.6%, P<0.001), and a higher likelihood of discharge to a skilled nursing facility (43.2% vs. 32.2%, P<0.001) compared to index hospitalization. Conclusions: In patients with primary diagnosis of critical limb ischemia, 30-day critical limb ischemia-related readmission rate was affected by initial management strategy and the severity of critical limb ischemia. Readmission was associated with a significantly higher rate of amputation, increased length of stay, and a more frequent discharge to an alternate care facility than index admission and thus may serve as a useful quality of care metric in critical limb ischemia patients.
AB - Objectives: There is paucity of information regarding critical limb ischemia-related readmission rates in patients admitted with critical limb ischemia. We studied 30-day critical limb ischemia-related readmission rate, its predictors, and clinical outcomes using a nationwide real-world dataset. Methods: We did a secondary analysis of the 2013 Nationwide Readmissions Database. We included all patients with a primary diagnosis of extremity rest pain, ulceration, and gangrene secondary to peripheral arterial disease. From this group, all patients readmitted with similar diagnosis within 30 days were recorded. Results: Of the total 25,111 index hospitalization for critical limb ischemia, 1270 (5%) were readmitted with a primary diagnosis of critical limb ischemia within 30 days. The readmission rate was highest (9.5%) for the group that did not have any intervention (revascularization or major amputation) and was lowest for surgical revascularization and major amputation groups (2.6% and 1.3%, P value <0.001 for all groups). Severity of critical limb ischemia at index admission was associated with a significantly higher rate of 30-day readmission. Critical limb ischemia-related readmission was associated with a higher rate of major amputation (29.6% vs. 16.2%, P<0.001), a lower rate of any revascularization procedure (46% vs. 62.6%, P<0.001), and a higher likelihood of discharge to a skilled nursing facility (43.2% vs. 32.2%, P<0.001) compared to index hospitalization. Conclusions: In patients with primary diagnosis of critical limb ischemia, 30-day critical limb ischemia-related readmission rate was affected by initial management strategy and the severity of critical limb ischemia. Readmission was associated with a significantly higher rate of amputation, increased length of stay, and a more frequent discharge to an alternate care facility than index admission and thus may serve as a useful quality of care metric in critical limb ischemia patients.
KW - Nationwide Readmissions Database
KW - amputation
KW - critical limb ischemia
KW - peripheral arterial disease
KW - revascularization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042080587&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042080587&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1708538117727955
DO - 10.1177/1708538117727955
M3 - Article
C2 - 28836900
AN - SCOPUS:85042080587
SN - 1708-5381
VL - 26
SP - 239
EP - 249
JO - Vascular
JF - Vascular
IS - 3
ER -