TY - JOUR
T1 - A Pelvic Health Curriculum in School Settings
T2 - The Effect on Adolescent Females' Knowledge
AU - Hebert-Beirne, Jennifer M.
AU - O'Conor, Rachel
AU - Ihm, Jeni Donatelli
AU - Parlier, Molly Kirk
AU - Lavender, Missy D.
AU - Brubaker, Linda
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - Study Objective In this pilot study we ascertained baseline knowledge of pelvic anatomy and function among female adolescents and tested the educational effectiveness of a pelvic health curriculum among female adolescent students with the hypothesis that teaching pelvic anatomy, muscle, and organ function, and pelvic hygiene increases pelvic health knowledge. Design Intervention-control group, community-based effectiveness study. Setting Three Chicago area schools with racial minority and low-income student populations were selected as study sites. Participants One hundred sixty-eight students with a mean age of 14.1 (±0.1) years. Most (69%) self-reported race as black or African American; 23.8% reported Hispanic ethnicity. Interventions Pelvic health teachers delivered 6 weekly, 1-hour classes (intervention group, n = 103; control group, n = 65). A comparison control group received standard curricula (physical education or science). Main Outcome Measures Knowledge change was measured using the Adolescent Bladder and Pelvic Health Questionnaire. We used χ2 tests to compared bivariate differences between study arms and generalized equation estimate to test for before and after change across groups. Results Baseline pelvic anatomy and function knowledge was minimal. The level of anatomical knowledge was very low with few in either group correctly able to identify where urine exits the body or the number of openings in the vulva. After intervention, significant increases in knowledge included pelvic floor muscle awareness in the control and intervention group (20% vs 89%; P < .001), pelvic floor muscle exercise benefit (31% vs 78%; P < .001), and knowledge that urine loss was abnormal (25.4% vs 60%; P < .001). More participants correctly identified organs within the pelvic structure, the vagina (21.5% vs 51.5%; P < .001), pelvic floor (16.9% vs 57.3%; P < .001), and the bladder (12.3% vs 42.7%; P < .001). Conclusion In this study we identified pelvic-related knowledge deficits among female adolescents and suggest that short-term pelvic health educational intervention results in significant knowledge acquisition.
AB - Study Objective In this pilot study we ascertained baseline knowledge of pelvic anatomy and function among female adolescents and tested the educational effectiveness of a pelvic health curriculum among female adolescent students with the hypothesis that teaching pelvic anatomy, muscle, and organ function, and pelvic hygiene increases pelvic health knowledge. Design Intervention-control group, community-based effectiveness study. Setting Three Chicago area schools with racial minority and low-income student populations were selected as study sites. Participants One hundred sixty-eight students with a mean age of 14.1 (±0.1) years. Most (69%) self-reported race as black or African American; 23.8% reported Hispanic ethnicity. Interventions Pelvic health teachers delivered 6 weekly, 1-hour classes (intervention group, n = 103; control group, n = 65). A comparison control group received standard curricula (physical education or science). Main Outcome Measures Knowledge change was measured using the Adolescent Bladder and Pelvic Health Questionnaire. We used χ2 tests to compared bivariate differences between study arms and generalized equation estimate to test for before and after change across groups. Results Baseline pelvic anatomy and function knowledge was minimal. The level of anatomical knowledge was very low with few in either group correctly able to identify where urine exits the body or the number of openings in the vulva. After intervention, significant increases in knowledge included pelvic floor muscle awareness in the control and intervention group (20% vs 89%; P < .001), pelvic floor muscle exercise benefit (31% vs 78%; P < .001), and knowledge that urine loss was abnormal (25.4% vs 60%; P < .001). More participants correctly identified organs within the pelvic structure, the vagina (21.5% vs 51.5%; P < .001), pelvic floor (16.9% vs 57.3%; P < .001), and the bladder (12.3% vs 42.7%; P < .001). Conclusion In this study we identified pelvic-related knowledge deficits among female adolescents and suggest that short-term pelvic health educational intervention results in significant knowledge acquisition.
KW - Adolescent
KW - Bladder
KW - Female
KW - Knowledge
KW - Pelvic health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986207385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986207385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpag.2015.09.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jpag.2015.09.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 26409155
AN - SCOPUS:84986207385
SN - 1083-3188
VL - 30
SP - 188
EP - 192
JO - Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology
JF - Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology
IS - 2
ER -