TY - JOUR
T1 - A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Multisite Study Using Omalizumab-facilitated Rapid Desensitization to Test Continued vs Discontinued Dosing in Multifood Allergic Individuals
AU - Andorf, Sandra
AU - Purington, Natasha
AU - Kumar, Divya
AU - Long, Andrew
AU - O'Laughlin, Katherine L.
AU - Sicherer, Scott
AU - Sampson, Hugh
AU - Cianferoni, Antonella
AU - Whitehorn, Terri Brown
AU - Petroni, Daniel
AU - Makhija, Melanie Mala
AU - Robison, Rachel G
AU - Lierl, Michelle
AU - Logsdon, Stephanie
AU - Desai, Manisha
AU - Galli, Stephen J.
AU - Rael, Efren
AU - Assa'ad, Amal
AU - Chinthrajah, Sharon
AU - Pongracic, Jacqueline A
AU - Spergel, Jonathan M.
AU - Tam, Jonathan
AU - Tilles, Stephen
AU - Wang, Julie
AU - Nadeau, Kari
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - Background: As there is limited data on the sustainability of desensitization of multifood-oral immunotherapy (multifood-OIT), we conducted a multisite multifood-OIT study to compare the efficacy of successful desensitization with sustained dosing vs discontinued dosing after multifood-OIT. Methods: We enrolled 70 participants, aged 5–22 years with multiple food allergies confirmed by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs). In the open-label phase of the study, all participants received omalizumab (weeks 1–16) and multi-OIT (2–5 allergens; weeks 8–30) and eligible participants (on maintenance dose of each allergen by weeks 28–29) were randomized 1:1:1 to 1 g, 300 mg, or 0 mg arms (blinded, weeks 30–36) and then tested by food challenge at week 36. Success was defined as passing 2 g food challenge to at least 2 foods in week 36. Findings: Most participants were able to reach a dose of 2 g or higher of each of 2, 3, 4, and 5 food allergens (as applicable to the participant's food allergens in OIT) in week 36 food challenges. Using an intent-to-treat analysis, we did not find evidence that a 300 mg dose was effectively different than a 1 g dose in maintaining desensitization, and both together were more effective than OIT discontinuation (0 mg dose) (85% vs 55%, P = 0.03). Fifty-five percent of the intent-to-treat participants and 69% of per protocol participants randomized to the 0 mg arm showed no objective reactivity after 6 weeks of discontinuation. Cross-desensitization was found between cashew/pistachio and walnut/pecan when only one of the foods was part of OIT. No statistically significant safety differences were found between the three arms. Interpretation: These results suggest that sustained desensitization after omalizumab-facilitated multi-OIT best occurs through continued maintenance OIT dosing of either 300 mg or 1 g of each food allergen as opposed to discontinuation of multi-OIT. Funding: Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Jeff and MacKenzie Bezos, NIAID AADCRC U19AI104209. Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02626611.
AB - Background: As there is limited data on the sustainability of desensitization of multifood-oral immunotherapy (multifood-OIT), we conducted a multisite multifood-OIT study to compare the efficacy of successful desensitization with sustained dosing vs discontinued dosing after multifood-OIT. Methods: We enrolled 70 participants, aged 5–22 years with multiple food allergies confirmed by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs). In the open-label phase of the study, all participants received omalizumab (weeks 1–16) and multi-OIT (2–5 allergens; weeks 8–30) and eligible participants (on maintenance dose of each allergen by weeks 28–29) were randomized 1:1:1 to 1 g, 300 mg, or 0 mg arms (blinded, weeks 30–36) and then tested by food challenge at week 36. Success was defined as passing 2 g food challenge to at least 2 foods in week 36. Findings: Most participants were able to reach a dose of 2 g or higher of each of 2, 3, 4, and 5 food allergens (as applicable to the participant's food allergens in OIT) in week 36 food challenges. Using an intent-to-treat analysis, we did not find evidence that a 300 mg dose was effectively different than a 1 g dose in maintaining desensitization, and both together were more effective than OIT discontinuation (0 mg dose) (85% vs 55%, P = 0.03). Fifty-five percent of the intent-to-treat participants and 69% of per protocol participants randomized to the 0 mg arm showed no objective reactivity after 6 weeks of discontinuation. Cross-desensitization was found between cashew/pistachio and walnut/pecan when only one of the foods was part of OIT. No statistically significant safety differences were found between the three arms. Interpretation: These results suggest that sustained desensitization after omalizumab-facilitated multi-OIT best occurs through continued maintenance OIT dosing of either 300 mg or 1 g of each food allergen as opposed to discontinuation of multi-OIT. Funding: Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Jeff and MacKenzie Bezos, NIAID AADCRC U19AI104209. Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02626611.
KW - Food allergen
KW - Food allergy
KW - Omalizumab
KW - Oral immunotherapy
KW - Sustained unresponsiveness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064149807&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064149807&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.12.006
DO - 10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.12.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 31193674
AN - SCOPUS:85064149807
SN - 2589-5370
VL - 7
SP - 27
EP - 38
JO - EClinicalMedicine
JF - EClinicalMedicine
ER -