A phase III study to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of fasinumab in patients with pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee or hip

Stephen J. DiMartino*, Jingning Mei, Thomas J. Schnitzer, Haitao Gao, Simon Eng, Christine Winslow, Tina Ho, Kenneth C. Turner, Hazem E. Hassan, Yamini Patel, John D. Davis, Ngan Trinh, Angela Manley, Garen Manvelian, Michael Fetell, Ned Braunstein, Gregory P. Geba, Paula Dakin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Pain associated with osteoarthritis (OA) is frequently disabling; treatments are often ineffective or intolerable. Fasinumab selectively inhibits nerve-growth factor and has shown efficacy for the management of OA pain. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, phase III safety study, patients with moderate-to-severe OA pain and history of inadequate pain relief received placebo or fasinumab (at 1, 3, 6, and 9 ​mg every 4 weeks [Q4W] and 1 and 6 ​mg every 8 weeks [Q8W] for 52 weeks). Primary safety endpoints included adverse events, adjudicated arthropathies (AAs), and joint replacements (JRs). Co-primary endpoints of an efficacy sub-study were change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and physical function scores. During the study, higher fasinumab doses were discontinued for safety; 1 ​mg doses continued. Results: Of 13,945 patients screened, 5331 were randomized; 1074 were included in the efficacy sub-study. AAs and JRs occurred in all groups. Increased severity of disease at baseline was associated with higher rates of AAs and JRs. A dose-dependent risk of AA or JR was observed for fasinumab; in the 1 ​mg groups, only a small percentage of patients with JR had prior AA. Fasinumab significantly improved WOMAC pain and physical function scores compared with placebo; least squares mean differences versus placebo were −1.22 and ​−1.20 for 1 ​mg Q4W and −0.73 and ​−0.74 for 1 ​mg Q8W, respectively (P<0.001). Conclusion: AAs and JRs showed a dose relationship to fasinumab and were associated with baseline OA status. Fasinumab achieved statistically significant improvements in WOMAC pain and physical function scores compared with placebo.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number100533
JournalOsteoarthritis and Cartilage Open
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024

Funding

This study was funded by Teva Pharmaceuticals and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The authors would like to thank the patients, their families, and all investigators involved in this study. Medical writing support, under the direction of the authors, was provided by Kerren Davenport, BSc, of Prime (Knutsford, UK), funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. according to Good Publication Practice guidelines ( Link ). The sponsor was involved in the study design and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, as well as data checking of information provided in the manuscript. The authors had unrestricted access to study data, were responsible for all content and editorial decisions, and received no honoraria related to the development of this publication.

Keywords

  • Fasinumab
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Pain
  • Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Biomedical Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A phase III study to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of fasinumab in patients with pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee or hip'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this