Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: Female chronic pelvic pain is prevalent and causes disability. Can women with self-reported chronic pelvic pain (CPP) be distinguished from pain-free women by demonstrating a greater number of abnormal musculoskeletal findings on examination? Methods: In this cross-sectional study, blinded examiners performed 9 physical exam maneuvers on 48 participants; 19 with CPP, and 29 pain-free. Frequency of positive findings between groups, total number of positive exam findings, cluster analysis, and sensitivity - specificity analyses were performed. Results: Women with CPP presented with significantly more abnormal findings than pain-free women. By using two examination maneuvers, examiners correctly classified women with self-reported CPP from pain-free women 85% of the time. Conclusions: Abnormal findings on musculoskeletal exam are more common in women with self-reported CPP. Women with CPP might benefit from a faster time to diagnosis and improved treatment outcomes if a musculoskeletal contribution to CPP was identified earlier.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 50-56 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 2012 |
Funding
This article was supported in part by a grant from the Section on Women’s Health Foundation Research Grant of the American Physical Therapy Association to the first author.
Keywords
- Chronic pelvic pain
- Diagnosis
- Examination
- Musculoskeletal
- Rehabilitation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Complementary and Manual Therapy
- Complementary and alternative medicine
- Rehabilitation
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation