TY - JOUR
T1 - A prospective study assessing complication rates and patient-reported outcomes in breast reconstructions using a novel, deep dermal human acellular dermal matrix
AU - Vu, Michael M.
AU - De Oliveira, Gildasio S.
AU - Mayer, Kristen E.
AU - Blough, Jordan T.
AU - Kim, John Y.S.
N1 - Funding Information:
2015. Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Wolters Disclosure: This research received funding from the Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation (MTF). John Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access Kim is a consultant for MTF. MTF did not participate article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons in any capacity in the design or conduct of the study, Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 analysis of data, or writing of the manuscript. All other (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and authors have no financial interest to declare in rela-share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot tion to the content of this article. The Article Processing DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000574be changed in any way or used commercially. Charge was paid for by the authors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The Authors. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Background: The value proposition of an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) taken from the deep dermis is that the allograft may be more porous, allowing for enhanced integration and revascularization. In turn, this characteristic may attenuate complications related to foreign body reactions, seromas, and infection. However, this is juxtaposed against the potential loss of allograft structural integrity, with subsequent risk of malposition and extrusion. Despite the active use of novel, deep dermal ADMs, the clinical outcomes of this new technology has not been well studied. Methods: This is a prospective study to evaluate surgical and patient-reported outcomes using a deep dermal ADM, FlexHD Pliable. Surgical outcomes and BREAST-Q patient-reported outcomes were evaluated postoperatively at 2- and 6-month time points. Results: Seventy-two breasts (41 patients) underwent reconstruction. Complication rate was 12.5%, including 2 hematomas and 7 flap necroses. One case of flap necrosis led to reconstructive failure. Notably, there were no cases of infection, seroma, or implant extrusion or malposition. Average BREAST-Q scores were satisfaction with outcome (70.13 ± 23.87), satisfaction with breasts (58.53 ± 20.00), psychosocial well being (67.97 ± 20.93), sexual well being (54.11 ± 27.72), and physical well being (70.45 ± 15.44). Two-month postoperative BREAST-Q scores decreased compared with baseline and returned to baseline by 6 months. Postoperative radiation therapy had a negative effect on satisfaction with breasts (P = 0.004) and sexual well being (P = 0.006). Conclusions: Deep dermal ADM is a novel modification of traditional allograft technology. Use of the deep dermal ADM yielded acceptably low complication rates and satisfactory patient-reported outcomes.
AB - Background: The value proposition of an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) taken from the deep dermis is that the allograft may be more porous, allowing for enhanced integration and revascularization. In turn, this characteristic may attenuate complications related to foreign body reactions, seromas, and infection. However, this is juxtaposed against the potential loss of allograft structural integrity, with subsequent risk of malposition and extrusion. Despite the active use of novel, deep dermal ADMs, the clinical outcomes of this new technology has not been well studied. Methods: This is a prospective study to evaluate surgical and patient-reported outcomes using a deep dermal ADM, FlexHD Pliable. Surgical outcomes and BREAST-Q patient-reported outcomes were evaluated postoperatively at 2- and 6-month time points. Results: Seventy-two breasts (41 patients) underwent reconstruction. Complication rate was 12.5%, including 2 hematomas and 7 flap necroses. One case of flap necrosis led to reconstructive failure. Notably, there were no cases of infection, seroma, or implant extrusion or malposition. Average BREAST-Q scores were satisfaction with outcome (70.13 ± 23.87), satisfaction with breasts (58.53 ± 20.00), psychosocial well being (67.97 ± 20.93), sexual well being (54.11 ± 27.72), and physical well being (70.45 ± 15.44). Two-month postoperative BREAST-Q scores decreased compared with baseline and returned to baseline by 6 months. Postoperative radiation therapy had a negative effect on satisfaction with breasts (P = 0.004) and sexual well being (P = 0.006). Conclusions: Deep dermal ADM is a novel modification of traditional allograft technology. Use of the deep dermal ADM yielded acceptably low complication rates and satisfactory patient-reported outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992717760&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992717760&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000574
DO - 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000574
M3 - Article
C2 - 26894010
AN - SCOPUS:84992717760
SN - 2169-7574
VL - 3
JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
IS - 12
M1 - e585
ER -