A Quantitative Analysis of Animation Deformity in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction

John Y.S. Kim, Cecil S. Qiu, Wen Kuan Chiu, Lauren N. Feld, Lauren M. Mioton, Aaron Kearney, Megan Fracol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Animation deformity is characterized by implant deformity with pectoralis contraction after subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. Extant methods to measure and analyze animation deformity are hampered by the paucity of objective, quantitative data. The authors endeavored to supplement subjective measures with an in-depth quantitative analysis. METHODS: Patients undergoing subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction were followed prospectively with video analysis of animation deformity. Nipple displacement and surface area of contour deformity in resting and contracted states were quantified using imaging software. Degree of animation was compared to breast size, body mass index, division of pectoralis muscle, complications, and radiation therapy. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five reconstructed breasts (88 patients) were analyzed. Mean nipple displacement was 2.12 ± 1.04 cm, mean vector of nipple displacement was 62.5 ± 20.6 degrees, and mean area of skin contour irregularity was 16.4 ± 15.41 percent. Intraoperative pectoralis division, smooth/round implants, and bilateral reconstructions were associated with greater deformity. A three-tiered grading system based on thresholds of 2-cm net nipple displacement and 25 percent skin contour irregularity placed 41.4 percent of breasts in grade 1, 35.9 percent in grade 2, and 22.8 percent in grade 3. Interrater variability testing demonstrated 89.5 percent overall agreement (kappa = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the first quantitative analysis of animation deformity in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Geometric analysis of nipple displacement vector and increasing animation with pectoralis division both implicate the inferior pectoralis myotome as a primary driver of animation deformity. A concomitant grading schema was developed to provide a standardized framework for discussing animation from patient to patient and from study to study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)291-301
Number of pages11
JournalPlastic and reconstructive surgery
Volume144
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2019

Fingerprint

Nipples
Mammaplasty
Breast
Pectoralis Muscles
Skin
Body Mass Index
Radiotherapy
Software

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Kim, John Y.S. ; Qiu, Cecil S. ; Chiu, Wen Kuan ; Feld, Lauren N. ; Mioton, Lauren M. ; Kearney, Aaron ; Fracol, Megan. / A Quantitative Analysis of Animation Deformity in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction. In: Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2019 ; Vol. 144, No. 2. pp. 291-301.
@article{d670154fa9e246a7ad00c4c54afa98bb,
title = "A Quantitative Analysis of Animation Deformity in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Animation deformity is characterized by implant deformity with pectoralis contraction after subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. Extant methods to measure and analyze animation deformity are hampered by the paucity of objective, quantitative data. The authors endeavored to supplement subjective measures with an in-depth quantitative analysis. METHODS: Patients undergoing subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction were followed prospectively with video analysis of animation deformity. Nipple displacement and surface area of contour deformity in resting and contracted states were quantified using imaging software. Degree of animation was compared to breast size, body mass index, division of pectoralis muscle, complications, and radiation therapy. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five reconstructed breasts (88 patients) were analyzed. Mean nipple displacement was 2.12 ± 1.04 cm, mean vector of nipple displacement was 62.5 ± 20.6 degrees, and mean area of skin contour irregularity was 16.4 ± 15.41 percent. Intraoperative pectoralis division, smooth/round implants, and bilateral reconstructions were associated with greater deformity. A three-tiered grading system based on thresholds of 2-cm net nipple displacement and 25 percent skin contour irregularity placed 41.4 percent of breasts in grade 1, 35.9 percent in grade 2, and 22.8 percent in grade 3. Interrater variability testing demonstrated 89.5 percent overall agreement (kappa = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the first quantitative analysis of animation deformity in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Geometric analysis of nipple displacement vector and increasing animation with pectoralis division both implicate the inferior pectoralis myotome as a primary driver of animation deformity. A concomitant grading schema was developed to provide a standardized framework for discussing animation from patient to patient and from study to study.",
author = "Kim, {John Y.S.} and Qiu, {Cecil S.} and Chiu, {Wen Kuan} and Feld, {Lauren N.} and Mioton, {Lauren M.} and Aaron Kearney and Megan Fracol",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000005800",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "144",
pages = "291--301",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

A Quantitative Analysis of Animation Deformity in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction. / Kim, John Y.S.; Qiu, Cecil S.; Chiu, Wen Kuan; Feld, Lauren N.; Mioton, Lauren M.; Kearney, Aaron; Fracol, Megan.

In: Plastic and reconstructive surgery, Vol. 144, No. 2, 01.08.2019, p. 291-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Quantitative Analysis of Animation Deformity in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction

AU - Kim, John Y.S.

AU - Qiu, Cecil S.

AU - Chiu, Wen Kuan

AU - Feld, Lauren N.

AU - Mioton, Lauren M.

AU - Kearney, Aaron

AU - Fracol, Megan

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Animation deformity is characterized by implant deformity with pectoralis contraction after subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. Extant methods to measure and analyze animation deformity are hampered by the paucity of objective, quantitative data. The authors endeavored to supplement subjective measures with an in-depth quantitative analysis. METHODS: Patients undergoing subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction were followed prospectively with video analysis of animation deformity. Nipple displacement and surface area of contour deformity in resting and contracted states were quantified using imaging software. Degree of animation was compared to breast size, body mass index, division of pectoralis muscle, complications, and radiation therapy. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five reconstructed breasts (88 patients) were analyzed. Mean nipple displacement was 2.12 ± 1.04 cm, mean vector of nipple displacement was 62.5 ± 20.6 degrees, and mean area of skin contour irregularity was 16.4 ± 15.41 percent. Intraoperative pectoralis division, smooth/round implants, and bilateral reconstructions were associated with greater deformity. A three-tiered grading system based on thresholds of 2-cm net nipple displacement and 25 percent skin contour irregularity placed 41.4 percent of breasts in grade 1, 35.9 percent in grade 2, and 22.8 percent in grade 3. Interrater variability testing demonstrated 89.5 percent overall agreement (kappa = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the first quantitative analysis of animation deformity in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Geometric analysis of nipple displacement vector and increasing animation with pectoralis division both implicate the inferior pectoralis myotome as a primary driver of animation deformity. A concomitant grading schema was developed to provide a standardized framework for discussing animation from patient to patient and from study to study.

AB - BACKGROUND: Animation deformity is characterized by implant deformity with pectoralis contraction after subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. Extant methods to measure and analyze animation deformity are hampered by the paucity of objective, quantitative data. The authors endeavored to supplement subjective measures with an in-depth quantitative analysis. METHODS: Patients undergoing subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction were followed prospectively with video analysis of animation deformity. Nipple displacement and surface area of contour deformity in resting and contracted states were quantified using imaging software. Degree of animation was compared to breast size, body mass index, division of pectoralis muscle, complications, and radiation therapy. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five reconstructed breasts (88 patients) were analyzed. Mean nipple displacement was 2.12 ± 1.04 cm, mean vector of nipple displacement was 62.5 ± 20.6 degrees, and mean area of skin contour irregularity was 16.4 ± 15.41 percent. Intraoperative pectoralis division, smooth/round implants, and bilateral reconstructions were associated with greater deformity. A three-tiered grading system based on thresholds of 2-cm net nipple displacement and 25 percent skin contour irregularity placed 41.4 percent of breasts in grade 1, 35.9 percent in grade 2, and 22.8 percent in grade 3. Interrater variability testing demonstrated 89.5 percent overall agreement (kappa = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the first quantitative analysis of animation deformity in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Geometric analysis of nipple displacement vector and increasing animation with pectoralis division both implicate the inferior pectoralis myotome as a primary driver of animation deformity. A concomitant grading schema was developed to provide a standardized framework for discussing animation from patient to patient and from study to study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060864546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060864546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005800

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005800

M3 - Article

C2 - 31348331

AN - SCOPUS:85060864546

VL - 144

SP - 291

EP - 301

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 2

ER -