A Quantitative Analysis of Online Plastic Surgeon Reviews for Abdominoplasty

Cecil S. Qiu, Sara M. Hockney, Sergey Y. Turin, Robert G. Dorfman, John Y.S. Kim*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Online reviews increasingly influence patients' decision-making. This is the first systematic, quantitative analysis of online reviews for abdominoplasty. Methods: Reviews for abdominoplasty were sampled from RealSelf, Yelp, and Google for six major metropolitan areas. A standard social sciences framework known as grounded theory was used to evaluate factors affecting satisfaction. The relative importance of factors was quantified using odds ratios. Results: Seven hundred ninety-four reviews met inclusion criteria. There was significant geographic variation with respect to number of reviews (p < 0.01) and average rating (p = 0.014). The authors identified 10 statistically significant themes affecting satisfaction. Of these, aesthetic outcome was the most mentioned theme [n = 368 (46.3 percent)] and the most dominant driver of satisfaction. Interactions with staff had the second highest odds ratio, driven by the fact that all negative staff interactions led to negative reviews. Postoperative care had the next highest odds ratio, and was demonstrated to counteract the negative effects of poor surgical outcomes on satisfaction. The occurrence of a surgical complication and the cost of surgery were least associated with satisfaction. Conclusions: This analysis is the first to use quantitative methods to identify dominant and nondominant factors affecting patient satisfaction in cosmetic surgery. The authors found that aesthetic outcome, staff interactions, and postoperative diligence were the most critical factors affecting satisfaction in abdominoplasty, whereas postoperative complications and cost were least important. Understanding the relative importance of factors may help to improve and protect one's online reputation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)734-742
Number of pages9
JournalPlastic and reconstructive surgery
Volume143
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

Abdominoplasty
Odds Ratio
Esthetics
Costs and Cost Analysis
Postoperative Care
Social Sciences
Plastic Surgery
Patient Satisfaction
Surgeons
Decision Making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Qiu, Cecil S. ; Hockney, Sara M. ; Turin, Sergey Y. ; Dorfman, Robert G. ; Kim, John Y.S. / A Quantitative Analysis of Online Plastic Surgeon Reviews for Abdominoplasty. In: Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2019 ; Vol. 143, No. 3. pp. 734-742.
@article{0bc7a61b52b040ec96c67962e0033fe4,
title = "A Quantitative Analysis of Online Plastic Surgeon Reviews for Abdominoplasty",
abstract = "Background: Online reviews increasingly influence patients' decision-making. This is the first systematic, quantitative analysis of online reviews for abdominoplasty. Methods: Reviews for abdominoplasty were sampled from RealSelf, Yelp, and Google for six major metropolitan areas. A standard social sciences framework known as grounded theory was used to evaluate factors affecting satisfaction. The relative importance of factors was quantified using odds ratios. Results: Seven hundred ninety-four reviews met inclusion criteria. There was significant geographic variation with respect to number of reviews (p < 0.01) and average rating (p = 0.014). The authors identified 10 statistically significant themes affecting satisfaction. Of these, aesthetic outcome was the most mentioned theme [n = 368 (46.3 percent)] and the most dominant driver of satisfaction. Interactions with staff had the second highest odds ratio, driven by the fact that all negative staff interactions led to negative reviews. Postoperative care had the next highest odds ratio, and was demonstrated to counteract the negative effects of poor surgical outcomes on satisfaction. The occurrence of a surgical complication and the cost of surgery were least associated with satisfaction. Conclusions: This analysis is the first to use quantitative methods to identify dominant and nondominant factors affecting patient satisfaction in cosmetic surgery. The authors found that aesthetic outcome, staff interactions, and postoperative diligence were the most critical factors affecting satisfaction in abdominoplasty, whereas postoperative complications and cost were least important. Understanding the relative importance of factors may help to improve and protect one's online reputation.",
author = "Qiu, {Cecil S.} and Hockney, {Sara M.} and Turin, {Sergey Y.} and Dorfman, {Robert G.} and Kim, {John Y.S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000005320",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "143",
pages = "734--742",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

A Quantitative Analysis of Online Plastic Surgeon Reviews for Abdominoplasty. / Qiu, Cecil S.; Hockney, Sara M.; Turin, Sergey Y.; Dorfman, Robert G.; Kim, John Y.S.

In: Plastic and reconstructive surgery, Vol. 143, No. 3, 01.03.2019, p. 734-742.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Quantitative Analysis of Online Plastic Surgeon Reviews for Abdominoplasty

AU - Qiu, Cecil S.

AU - Hockney, Sara M.

AU - Turin, Sergey Y.

AU - Dorfman, Robert G.

AU - Kim, John Y.S.

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Background: Online reviews increasingly influence patients' decision-making. This is the first systematic, quantitative analysis of online reviews for abdominoplasty. Methods: Reviews for abdominoplasty were sampled from RealSelf, Yelp, and Google for six major metropolitan areas. A standard social sciences framework known as grounded theory was used to evaluate factors affecting satisfaction. The relative importance of factors was quantified using odds ratios. Results: Seven hundred ninety-four reviews met inclusion criteria. There was significant geographic variation with respect to number of reviews (p < 0.01) and average rating (p = 0.014). The authors identified 10 statistically significant themes affecting satisfaction. Of these, aesthetic outcome was the most mentioned theme [n = 368 (46.3 percent)] and the most dominant driver of satisfaction. Interactions with staff had the second highest odds ratio, driven by the fact that all negative staff interactions led to negative reviews. Postoperative care had the next highest odds ratio, and was demonstrated to counteract the negative effects of poor surgical outcomes on satisfaction. The occurrence of a surgical complication and the cost of surgery were least associated with satisfaction. Conclusions: This analysis is the first to use quantitative methods to identify dominant and nondominant factors affecting patient satisfaction in cosmetic surgery. The authors found that aesthetic outcome, staff interactions, and postoperative diligence were the most critical factors affecting satisfaction in abdominoplasty, whereas postoperative complications and cost were least important. Understanding the relative importance of factors may help to improve and protect one's online reputation.

AB - Background: Online reviews increasingly influence patients' decision-making. This is the first systematic, quantitative analysis of online reviews for abdominoplasty. Methods: Reviews for abdominoplasty were sampled from RealSelf, Yelp, and Google for six major metropolitan areas. A standard social sciences framework known as grounded theory was used to evaluate factors affecting satisfaction. The relative importance of factors was quantified using odds ratios. Results: Seven hundred ninety-four reviews met inclusion criteria. There was significant geographic variation with respect to number of reviews (p < 0.01) and average rating (p = 0.014). The authors identified 10 statistically significant themes affecting satisfaction. Of these, aesthetic outcome was the most mentioned theme [n = 368 (46.3 percent)] and the most dominant driver of satisfaction. Interactions with staff had the second highest odds ratio, driven by the fact that all negative staff interactions led to negative reviews. Postoperative care had the next highest odds ratio, and was demonstrated to counteract the negative effects of poor surgical outcomes on satisfaction. The occurrence of a surgical complication and the cost of surgery were least associated with satisfaction. Conclusions: This analysis is the first to use quantitative methods to identify dominant and nondominant factors affecting patient satisfaction in cosmetic surgery. The authors found that aesthetic outcome, staff interactions, and postoperative diligence were the most critical factors affecting satisfaction in abdominoplasty, whereas postoperative complications and cost were least important. Understanding the relative importance of factors may help to improve and protect one's online reputation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064764914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064764914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005320

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005320

M3 - Article

C2 - 30817644

AN - SCOPUS:85064764914

VL - 143

SP - 734

EP - 742

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 3

ER -