A randomised comparison of free-handed vs air-Q™ assisted fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation in children < 2 years of age

Lisa Sohn, Narasimhan Jagannathan*, L. Sequera-Ramos, Amod Sawardekar, K. Schaldenbrand, Gildasio S De Oliveira Jr

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We prospectively compared free-handed and air-Q™ assisted fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation in children < 2 years of age. Eighty healthy children were enrolled and randomly assigned to a technique (free-handed or air-Q assisted) and operator (trainee or attending). Time, number of attempts and manoeuvres required were assessed. There was no difference in median (IQR [range]) time to successful tracheal intubation between the free-handed (52.2 (34.8-67.7 [19.7-108.0]) s), and the air-Q assisted (60.3 (45.5-75.1 [28.1-129.0]) s; p = 0.13) groups, or the number of attempts needed. The air-Q assisted group required fewer manoeuvres to optimise the laryngeal view (median (IQR [range]) 0 (0-1 [0-2])) than the free-handed group (1 (1-1 [0-3]); p < 0.001). In conclusion, fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation times were similar with and without the use of the air-Q, but supraglottic airway devices may be a consideration for their other practical advantages.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)723-728
Number of pages6
JournalAnaesthesia
Volume69
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Intubation
Air
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

@article{e49b3c8969334be7bc1ed560a1aa8782,
title = "A randomised comparison of free-handed vs air-Q™ assisted fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation in children < 2 years of age",
abstract = "We prospectively compared free-handed and air-Q™ assisted fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation in children < 2 years of age. Eighty healthy children were enrolled and randomly assigned to a technique (free-handed or air-Q assisted) and operator (trainee or attending). Time, number of attempts and manoeuvres required were assessed. There was no difference in median (IQR [range]) time to successful tracheal intubation between the free-handed (52.2 (34.8-67.7 [19.7-108.0]) s), and the air-Q assisted (60.3 (45.5-75.1 [28.1-129.0]) s; p = 0.13) groups, or the number of attempts needed. The air-Q assisted group required fewer manoeuvres to optimise the laryngeal view (median (IQR [range]) 0 (0-1 [0-2])) than the free-handed group (1 (1-1 [0-3]); p < 0.001). In conclusion, fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation times were similar with and without the use of the air-Q, but supraglottic airway devices may be a consideration for their other practical advantages.",
author = "Lisa Sohn and Narasimhan Jagannathan and L. Sequera-Ramos and Amod Sawardekar and K. Schaldenbrand and {De Oliveira Jr}, {Gildasio S}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/anae.12667",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "723--728",
journal = "Anaesthesia",
issn = "0003-2409",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

A randomised comparison of free-handed vs air-Q™ assisted fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation in children < 2 years of age. / Sohn, Lisa; Jagannathan, Narasimhan; Sequera-Ramos, L.; Sawardekar, Amod; Schaldenbrand, K.; De Oliveira Jr, Gildasio S.

In: Anaesthesia, Vol. 69, No. 7, 01.01.2014, p. 723-728.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomised comparison of free-handed vs air-Q™ assisted fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation in children < 2 years of age

AU - Sohn, Lisa

AU - Jagannathan, Narasimhan

AU - Sequera-Ramos, L.

AU - Sawardekar, Amod

AU - Schaldenbrand, K.

AU - De Oliveira Jr, Gildasio S

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - We prospectively compared free-handed and air-Q™ assisted fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation in children < 2 years of age. Eighty healthy children were enrolled and randomly assigned to a technique (free-handed or air-Q assisted) and operator (trainee or attending). Time, number of attempts and manoeuvres required were assessed. There was no difference in median (IQR [range]) time to successful tracheal intubation between the free-handed (52.2 (34.8-67.7 [19.7-108.0]) s), and the air-Q assisted (60.3 (45.5-75.1 [28.1-129.0]) s; p = 0.13) groups, or the number of attempts needed. The air-Q assisted group required fewer manoeuvres to optimise the laryngeal view (median (IQR [range]) 0 (0-1 [0-2])) than the free-handed group (1 (1-1 [0-3]); p < 0.001). In conclusion, fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation times were similar with and without the use of the air-Q, but supraglottic airway devices may be a consideration for their other practical advantages.

AB - We prospectively compared free-handed and air-Q™ assisted fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation in children < 2 years of age. Eighty healthy children were enrolled and randomly assigned to a technique (free-handed or air-Q assisted) and operator (trainee or attending). Time, number of attempts and manoeuvres required were assessed. There was no difference in median (IQR [range]) time to successful tracheal intubation between the free-handed (52.2 (34.8-67.7 [19.7-108.0]) s), and the air-Q assisted (60.3 (45.5-75.1 [28.1-129.0]) s; p = 0.13) groups, or the number of attempts needed. The air-Q assisted group required fewer manoeuvres to optimise the laryngeal view (median (IQR [range]) 0 (0-1 [0-2])) than the free-handed group (1 (1-1 [0-3]); p < 0.001). In conclusion, fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation times were similar with and without the use of the air-Q, but supraglottic airway devices may be a consideration for their other practical advantages.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902386106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902386106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/anae.12667

DO - 10.1111/anae.12667

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 723

EP - 728

JO - Anaesthesia

JF - Anaesthesia

SN - 0003-2409

IS - 7

ER -