A randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme™ and LMA ProSeal™ in children

Narasimhan Jagannathan*, Lisa Sohn, Amod Sawardekar, J. Gordon, K. E. Langen, K. Anderson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Summary We conducted a randomised trial comparing the size-2 LMA Supreme™ with the LMA ProSeal™ in 60 children undergoing surgery. The outcomes measured were airway leak pressure, ease and time for insertion, fibreoptic examination, incidence of gastric insufflation, ease of gastric tube placement, quality of the airway during anaesthetic maintenance and complications. There were no statistically significant differences between the LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in median (IQR [range]) insertion time (12 (10-15 [7-18]) s vs 12 (10-13 [8-25]) s; p = 0.90), airway leak pressures (19 (16-21 [12-30]) cmH2O vs 18 (16-24 [10-34]) cmH2O; p = 0.55), fibreoptic position of the airway or drain tube, ease of gastric access and complications. Both devices provided effective ventilation requiring minimal airway manipulation. The LMA Supreme can be a useful alternative to the LMA ProSeal when single-use supraglottic devices with gastric access capabilities are required.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)632-639
Number of pages8
JournalAnaesthesia
Volume67
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2012

Fingerprint

Stomach
Pressure
Equipment and Supplies
Insufflation
Ventilation
Anesthetics
Maintenance
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

@article{6c542e21913042bc961a2179325ecef3,
title = "A randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme™ and LMA ProSeal™ in children",
abstract = "Summary We conducted a randomised trial comparing the size-2 LMA Supreme™ with the LMA ProSeal™ in 60 children undergoing surgery. The outcomes measured were airway leak pressure, ease and time for insertion, fibreoptic examination, incidence of gastric insufflation, ease of gastric tube placement, quality of the airway during anaesthetic maintenance and complications. There were no statistically significant differences between the LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in median (IQR [range]) insertion time (12 (10-15 [7-18]) s vs 12 (10-13 [8-25]) s; p = 0.90), airway leak pressures (19 (16-21 [12-30]) cmH2O vs 18 (16-24 [10-34]) cmH2O; p = 0.55), fibreoptic position of the airway or drain tube, ease of gastric access and complications. Both devices provided effective ventilation requiring minimal airway manipulation. The LMA Supreme can be a useful alternative to the LMA ProSeal when single-use supraglottic devices with gastric access capabilities are required.",
author = "Narasimhan Jagannathan and Lisa Sohn and Amod Sawardekar and J. Gordon and Langen, {K. E.} and K. Anderson",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07088.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "632--639",
journal = "Anaesthesia",
issn = "0003-2409",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

A randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme™ and LMA ProSeal™ in children. / Jagannathan, Narasimhan; Sohn, Lisa; Sawardekar, Amod; Gordon, J.; Langen, K. E.; Anderson, K.

In: Anaesthesia, Vol. 67, No. 6, 01.06.2012, p. 632-639.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme™ and LMA ProSeal™ in children

AU - Jagannathan, Narasimhan

AU - Sohn, Lisa

AU - Sawardekar, Amod

AU - Gordon, J.

AU - Langen, K. E.

AU - Anderson, K.

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - Summary We conducted a randomised trial comparing the size-2 LMA Supreme™ with the LMA ProSeal™ in 60 children undergoing surgery. The outcomes measured were airway leak pressure, ease and time for insertion, fibreoptic examination, incidence of gastric insufflation, ease of gastric tube placement, quality of the airway during anaesthetic maintenance and complications. There were no statistically significant differences between the LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in median (IQR [range]) insertion time (12 (10-15 [7-18]) s vs 12 (10-13 [8-25]) s; p = 0.90), airway leak pressures (19 (16-21 [12-30]) cmH2O vs 18 (16-24 [10-34]) cmH2O; p = 0.55), fibreoptic position of the airway or drain tube, ease of gastric access and complications. Both devices provided effective ventilation requiring minimal airway manipulation. The LMA Supreme can be a useful alternative to the LMA ProSeal when single-use supraglottic devices with gastric access capabilities are required.

AB - Summary We conducted a randomised trial comparing the size-2 LMA Supreme™ with the LMA ProSeal™ in 60 children undergoing surgery. The outcomes measured were airway leak pressure, ease and time for insertion, fibreoptic examination, incidence of gastric insufflation, ease of gastric tube placement, quality of the airway during anaesthetic maintenance and complications. There were no statistically significant differences between the LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in median (IQR [range]) insertion time (12 (10-15 [7-18]) s vs 12 (10-13 [8-25]) s; p = 0.90), airway leak pressures (19 (16-21 [12-30]) cmH2O vs 18 (16-24 [10-34]) cmH2O; p = 0.55), fibreoptic position of the airway or drain tube, ease of gastric access and complications. Both devices provided effective ventilation requiring minimal airway manipulation. The LMA Supreme can be a useful alternative to the LMA ProSeal when single-use supraglottic devices with gastric access capabilities are required.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860838710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860838710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07088.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07088.x

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 632

EP - 639

JO - Anaesthesia

JF - Anaesthesia

SN - 0003-2409

IS - 6

ER -