TY - JOUR
T1 - A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study of Granulocyte/Monocyte Apheresis for Active Ulcerative Colitis
AU - Sands, Bruce E.
AU - Sandborn, William J.
AU - Feagan, Brian
AU - Löfberg, Robert
AU - Hibi, Toshifumi
AU - Wang, Tao
AU - Gustofson, Lisa Marie
AU - Wong, Cindy J.
AU - Vandervoort, Margaret K.
AU - Hanauer, Stephen
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflicts of interest: The authors disclose the following relationships: Bruce E. Sands: grant or research support from Cerimon, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Centocor, Abbott Immunology, Prometheus Laboratories, Shire Pharmaceuticals, Protein Design Laboratories Biopharma, Otsuka America Pharmaceutical Inc, Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals; consultant for Axcan, Cerimon, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Centocor, Abbott Immunology, Prometheus Laboratories, Shire Pharmaceuticals, Protein Design Laboratories Biopharma, Otsuka America Pharmaceutical Inc, Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals; member of scientific advisory boards of Cerimon, Bristol-Squibb, Centocor, Abbott Immunology, Prometheus Laboratories, Shire Pharmaceuticals, Protein Design Laboratories Biopharma, Otsuka America Pharmaceutical Inc, Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals. William J. Sandborn: grant or research support from JIMRO/Otsuka Pharmaceuticals America Inc; consultant for JIMRO/Otsuka America Pharmaceuticals Inc. Brian Feagan: grant or research support from Schering-Plough, Otsuka, Milllennium, Tillotts, Abbott, Protein Design Labs, Boehringer Engelheim, Novartis, Centocor, Berlex, Synta, Schering Canada, Elan/Biogen, UCB Pharma, BMS, Proctor & Gamble, Napo Pharma; consultant for Synta, Millennium, Schering Canada, Celltech, Centocor, Elan/Biogen, Janssen-Ortho, Protein Design Labs, ISIS, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Santarus, Schering Plough, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Combinatorx, UCB Pharma, Napo Pharma, Abbott, Proctor & Gamble, Osiris, Berlex, AstraZeneca, GeneLogic Inc, Cerimon Pharm, Tioga Pharm, Serono, Genentech; member of the Speakers Bureau of AstraZeneca; member of the scientific advisory boards of Protein Design Labs, AstraZeneca, Elan/Biogen, Celltech, Synta, Schering Canada, Celgene. Robert Löfberg: grant or research support from Abbott Labs, Asahi, AstraZeneca, Celltech, Centocor, Elan, Ferring, InDex Pharmaceuticals, Meda, Otsuka Frankfurt Research Institute, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals Scandinavia, Pharmacia, Pfizer, Schering Plough, UCB; member of scientific advisory boards of Abbott Labs, Asahi, AstraZeneca, Celltech, Centocor, Connexion, Cosmo, Elan, InDex Pharmaceuticals, Meda, Novartis, Otsuka Frankfurt Research Institute, Pharmacia, Pfizer, Schering Plough, Schering AG, Serono, Therakos, UCB. Toshifumi Hibi: grant or research support from Abbott Japan, Ajinomoto Pharma, Asahi Kasei Kuraray Medical, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Pharmaceutical K. K., JIMRO, Nisshin Kyorin Pharmaceutical Company, Otsuka Pharma, Tanabe Mitsubishi Seiyaku, UCB Japan, UMN Pharma, Zeria Pharmaceutical. Lisa-Marie Gustafson and Tao Wang are employees of Otsuka America Pharmaceutical Inc.
PY - 2008/8
Y1 - 2008/8
N2 - Background & Aims: Activated granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages are implicated in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis. Open-label studies and clinical experience in Japan and Europe have suggested that granulocyte/monocyte apheresis is safe and effective in treating ulcerative colitis. Methods: We evaluated the efficacy of granulocyte/monocyte apheresis in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in patients with active moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (Mayo score 6-11) in community-based and tertiary care centers. As intervention, we used granulocyte/monocyte apheresis with the Adacolumn Apheresis System (JIMRO, Ltd, Takasaki, Japan) or sham apheresis in a 2:1 ratio for 9 weeks of treatment in a North American pivotal study (N = 168) and in a smaller, companion study of identical design conducted in Europe and Japan (N = 47). Results: In the pivotal study, clinical remission rates (Mayo score 0-2, with scores of 0 on rectal bleeding and 0 or 1 on endoscopic examination) were 17% and 11% for the granulocyte/monocyte apheresis (n = 112)- and sham-treatment groups, respectively (n = 56; P = .361). Clinical response (Mayo score reduction of ≥3 points from baseline) was observed in 44% and 39% of patients, respectively (P = .620). Similar changes were observed for the apheresis- and sham-treatment groups for endoscopic remission and response, and changes in Mayo and quality-of-life scores. The companion study and pooled data from both studies also yielded similar results. Conclusions: In this study, granulocyte/monocyte apheresis was well tolerated but did not demonstrate efficacy for induction of clinical remission or response in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.
AB - Background & Aims: Activated granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages are implicated in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis. Open-label studies and clinical experience in Japan and Europe have suggested that granulocyte/monocyte apheresis is safe and effective in treating ulcerative colitis. Methods: We evaluated the efficacy of granulocyte/monocyte apheresis in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in patients with active moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (Mayo score 6-11) in community-based and tertiary care centers. As intervention, we used granulocyte/monocyte apheresis with the Adacolumn Apheresis System (JIMRO, Ltd, Takasaki, Japan) or sham apheresis in a 2:1 ratio for 9 weeks of treatment in a North American pivotal study (N = 168) and in a smaller, companion study of identical design conducted in Europe and Japan (N = 47). Results: In the pivotal study, clinical remission rates (Mayo score 0-2, with scores of 0 on rectal bleeding and 0 or 1 on endoscopic examination) were 17% and 11% for the granulocyte/monocyte apheresis (n = 112)- and sham-treatment groups, respectively (n = 56; P = .361). Clinical response (Mayo score reduction of ≥3 points from baseline) was observed in 44% and 39% of patients, respectively (P = .620). Similar changes were observed for the apheresis- and sham-treatment groups for endoscopic remission and response, and changes in Mayo and quality-of-life scores. The companion study and pooled data from both studies also yielded similar results. Conclusions: In this study, granulocyte/monocyte apheresis was well tolerated but did not demonstrate efficacy for induction of clinical remission or response in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48749099982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48749099982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.023
DO - 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 18602921
AN - SCOPUS:48749099982
SN - 0016-5085
VL - 135
SP - 400
EP - 409
JO - Gastroenterology
JF - Gastroenterology
IS - 2
ER -