A randomized equivalence trial comparing the i-gel™ and laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ in children

Narasimhan Jagannathan*, Katherine Sommers, Lisa Sohn, Amod Sawardekar, Ravi Dipak Shah, Isabella Mukherji, Steven Miller, Polina Voronov, Sally Seraphin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ (Supreme) is a new single-use supraglottic device with gastric access capability now available in all sizes for children. Objectives To compare the i-gel™ with the Supreme in children for routine airway maintenance. Materials/Methods One hundred and seventy children, aged 3 months to 11 years, 5-50 kg in weight, were randomly assigned to receive either the i-gel™ or the Supreme. The primary outcome measured was airway leak pressure. Secondary outcomes included the following: ease and time for insertion, insertion success rate, fiberoptic grade of view, ease of gastric tube placement, number of airway manipulations, quality of airway during anesthetic maintenance, and complications. Results A total of 168 patients were assessed for the outcomes. The median (IQR [range]) airway leak pressure for the i-gel™ was higher than with the Supreme, 20 (18-25 [9-40]) cm H2O vs 17 (14-22 [10-40]) cm H2O, respectively (P = 0.001). There were no differences in the time for device insertion, fiberoptic grade of view, quality of airway, and complications. Median (IQR[range]) time of successful insertion of a gastric tube was faster with the Supreme, 12 (9.2-14.3 [5.2-44.2]) s than with the i-gel™, 14 (11.9-19 [6.9-75]) s; P = 0.01. The number of airway manipulations during placement was higher with the i-gel™ than with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme (12 vs 13 patients), P = 0.02. Conclusions In infants and children, when a single-use supraglottic device with gastric access capabilities is required, the i-gel™ demonstrated higher airway leak pressures and can be a useful alternative to the Supreme.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)127-133
Number of pages7
JournalPaediatric Anaesthesia
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2013

Fingerprint

Laryngeal Masks
Gels
Stomach
Pressure
Equipment and Supplies
Maintenance
Anesthetics
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • airway
  • clinical trial
  • devices

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

@article{482a92de866a4ffbba3877013a0d50b3,
title = "A randomized equivalence trial comparing the i-gel™ and laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ in children",
abstract = "Background The laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ (Supreme) is a new single-use supraglottic device with gastric access capability now available in all sizes for children. Objectives To compare the i-gel™ with the Supreme in children for routine airway maintenance. Materials/Methods One hundred and seventy children, aged 3 months to 11 years, 5-50 kg in weight, were randomly assigned to receive either the i-gel™ or the Supreme. The primary outcome measured was airway leak pressure. Secondary outcomes included the following: ease and time for insertion, insertion success rate, fiberoptic grade of view, ease of gastric tube placement, number of airway manipulations, quality of airway during anesthetic maintenance, and complications. Results A total of 168 patients were assessed for the outcomes. The median (IQR [range]) airway leak pressure for the i-gel™ was higher than with the Supreme, 20 (18-25 [9-40]) cm H2O vs 17 (14-22 [10-40]) cm H2O, respectively (P = 0.001). There were no differences in the time for device insertion, fiberoptic grade of view, quality of airway, and complications. Median (IQR[range]) time of successful insertion of a gastric tube was faster with the Supreme, 12 (9.2-14.3 [5.2-44.2]) s than with the i-gel™, 14 (11.9-19 [6.9-75]) s; P = 0.01. The number of airway manipulations during placement was higher with the i-gel™ than with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme (12 vs 13 patients), P = 0.02. Conclusions In infants and children, when a single-use supraglottic device with gastric access capabilities is required, the i-gel™ demonstrated higher airway leak pressures and can be a useful alternative to the Supreme.",
keywords = "airway, clinical trial, devices",
author = "Narasimhan Jagannathan and Katherine Sommers and Lisa Sohn and Amod Sawardekar and Shah, {Ravi Dipak} and Isabella Mukherji and Steven Miller and Polina Voronov and Sally Seraphin",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/pan.12078",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "127--133",
journal = "Paediatric Anaesthesia",
issn = "1155-5645",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

A randomized equivalence trial comparing the i-gel™ and laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ in children. / Jagannathan, Narasimhan; Sommers, Katherine; Sohn, Lisa; Sawardekar, Amod; Shah, Ravi Dipak; Mukherji, Isabella; Miller, Steven; Voronov, Polina; Seraphin, Sally.

In: Paediatric Anaesthesia, Vol. 23, No. 2, 01.02.2013, p. 127-133.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomized equivalence trial comparing the i-gel™ and laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ in children

AU - Jagannathan, Narasimhan

AU - Sommers, Katherine

AU - Sohn, Lisa

AU - Sawardekar, Amod

AU - Shah, Ravi Dipak

AU - Mukherji, Isabella

AU - Miller, Steven

AU - Voronov, Polina

AU - Seraphin, Sally

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - Background The laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ (Supreme) is a new single-use supraglottic device with gastric access capability now available in all sizes for children. Objectives To compare the i-gel™ with the Supreme in children for routine airway maintenance. Materials/Methods One hundred and seventy children, aged 3 months to 11 years, 5-50 kg in weight, were randomly assigned to receive either the i-gel™ or the Supreme. The primary outcome measured was airway leak pressure. Secondary outcomes included the following: ease and time for insertion, insertion success rate, fiberoptic grade of view, ease of gastric tube placement, number of airway manipulations, quality of airway during anesthetic maintenance, and complications. Results A total of 168 patients were assessed for the outcomes. The median (IQR [range]) airway leak pressure for the i-gel™ was higher than with the Supreme, 20 (18-25 [9-40]) cm H2O vs 17 (14-22 [10-40]) cm H2O, respectively (P = 0.001). There were no differences in the time for device insertion, fiberoptic grade of view, quality of airway, and complications. Median (IQR[range]) time of successful insertion of a gastric tube was faster with the Supreme, 12 (9.2-14.3 [5.2-44.2]) s than with the i-gel™, 14 (11.9-19 [6.9-75]) s; P = 0.01. The number of airway manipulations during placement was higher with the i-gel™ than with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme (12 vs 13 patients), P = 0.02. Conclusions In infants and children, when a single-use supraglottic device with gastric access capabilities is required, the i-gel™ demonstrated higher airway leak pressures and can be a useful alternative to the Supreme.

AB - Background The laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ (Supreme) is a new single-use supraglottic device with gastric access capability now available in all sizes for children. Objectives To compare the i-gel™ with the Supreme in children for routine airway maintenance. Materials/Methods One hundred and seventy children, aged 3 months to 11 years, 5-50 kg in weight, were randomly assigned to receive either the i-gel™ or the Supreme. The primary outcome measured was airway leak pressure. Secondary outcomes included the following: ease and time for insertion, insertion success rate, fiberoptic grade of view, ease of gastric tube placement, number of airway manipulations, quality of airway during anesthetic maintenance, and complications. Results A total of 168 patients were assessed for the outcomes. The median (IQR [range]) airway leak pressure for the i-gel™ was higher than with the Supreme, 20 (18-25 [9-40]) cm H2O vs 17 (14-22 [10-40]) cm H2O, respectively (P = 0.001). There were no differences in the time for device insertion, fiberoptic grade of view, quality of airway, and complications. Median (IQR[range]) time of successful insertion of a gastric tube was faster with the Supreme, 12 (9.2-14.3 [5.2-44.2]) s than with the i-gel™, 14 (11.9-19 [6.9-75]) s; P = 0.01. The number of airway manipulations during placement was higher with the i-gel™ than with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme (12 vs 13 patients), P = 0.02. Conclusions In infants and children, when a single-use supraglottic device with gastric access capabilities is required, the i-gel™ demonstrated higher airway leak pressures and can be a useful alternative to the Supreme.

KW - airway

KW - clinical trial

KW - devices

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872060723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872060723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pan.12078

DO - 10.1111/pan.12078

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 127

EP - 133

JO - Paediatric Anaesthesia

JF - Paediatric Anaesthesia

SN - 1155-5645

IS - 2

ER -