TY - JOUR
T1 - A Randomized Phase II Trial of Epigenetic Priming with Guadecitabine and Carboplatin in Platinum-resistant, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
AU - Oza, Amit M.
AU - Matulonis, Ursula A.
AU - Secord, Angeles Alvarez
AU - Nemunaitis, John
AU - Roman, Lynda D.
AU - Blagden, Sarah P.
AU - Banerjee, Susana
AU - McGuire, William P.
AU - Ghamande, Sharad
AU - Birrer, Michael J.
AU - Fleming, Gini F.
AU - Markham, Merry Jennifer
AU - Hirte, Hal W.
AU - Provencher, Diane M.
AU - Basu, Bristi
AU - Kristeleit, Rebecca
AU - Armstrong, Deborah K.
AU - Schwartz, Benjamin
AU - Braly, Patricia
AU - Hall, Geoff D.
AU - Nephew, Kenneth P.
AU - Jueliger, Simone
AU - Oganesian, Aram
AU - Naim, Sue
AU - Hao, Yong
AU - Keer, Harold
AU - Azab, Mohammad
AU - Matei, Daniela
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded in part by the NCI Award CA182832-01 and the V-Foundation (to D. Matei and K.P. Nephew). Imperial, UCH, and Royal Marsden Hospitals are supported as CRUK and Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC). This study was supported in part by Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc. Medical writing support was provided by Paul Sobol and Ryan Draker from Six Degrees Medical Consulting and funded by Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Association for Cancer Research Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Purpose: Platinum resistance in ovarian cancer is associated with epigenetic modifications. Hypomethylating agents (HMA) have been studied as carboplatin resensitizing agents in ovarian cancer. This randomized phase II trial compared guadecitabine, a second-generation HMA, and carboplatin (GþC) against second-line chemotherapy in women with measurable or detectable platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients received either GþC (guadecitabine 30 mg/m2 s.c. once-daily for 5 days and carboplatin) or treatment of choice (TC; topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine) in 28-day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were RECIST v1.1 and CA-125 response rate, 6-month PFS, and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 100 patients treated, 51 received GþC and 49 received TC, of which 27 crossed over to GþC. The study did not meet its primary endpoint as the median PFS was not statistically different between arms (16.3 weeks vs. 9.1 weeks in the GþC and TC groups, respectively; P ¼ 0.07). However, the 6-month PFS rate was significantly higher in the GþC group (37% vs. 11% in TC group; P ¼ 0.003). The incidence of grade 3 or higher toxicity was similar in GþC and TC groups (51% and 49%, respectively), with neutropenia and leukopenia being more frequent in the GþC group. Conclusions: Although this trial did not show superiority for PFS of GþC versus TC, the 6-month PFS increased in GþC treated patients. Further refinement of this strategy should focus on identification of predictive markers for patient selection.
AB - Purpose: Platinum resistance in ovarian cancer is associated with epigenetic modifications. Hypomethylating agents (HMA) have been studied as carboplatin resensitizing agents in ovarian cancer. This randomized phase II trial compared guadecitabine, a second-generation HMA, and carboplatin (GþC) against second-line chemotherapy in women with measurable or detectable platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients received either GþC (guadecitabine 30 mg/m2 s.c. once-daily for 5 days and carboplatin) or treatment of choice (TC; topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine) in 28-day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were RECIST v1.1 and CA-125 response rate, 6-month PFS, and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 100 patients treated, 51 received GþC and 49 received TC, of which 27 crossed over to GþC. The study did not meet its primary endpoint as the median PFS was not statistically different between arms (16.3 weeks vs. 9.1 weeks in the GþC and TC groups, respectively; P ¼ 0.07). However, the 6-month PFS rate was significantly higher in the GþC group (37% vs. 11% in TC group; P ¼ 0.003). The incidence of grade 3 or higher toxicity was similar in GþC and TC groups (51% and 49%, respectively), with neutropenia and leukopenia being more frequent in the GþC group. Conclusions: Although this trial did not show superiority for PFS of GþC versus TC, the 6-month PFS increased in GþC treated patients. Further refinement of this strategy should focus on identification of predictive markers for patient selection.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081125780&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85081125780&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1638
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1638
M3 - Article
C2 - 31831561
AN - SCOPUS:85081125780
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 26
SP - 1009
EP - 1016
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 5
ER -