A reputation for honesty

Drew Fudenberg, Ying Gao, Harry Pei*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We analyze situations where players build reputations for honesty rather than for playing particular actions. A patient player faces a sequence of short-run opponents. Before players act, the patient player announces their intended action after observing both a private payoff shock and a signal of what actions will be feasible that period. The patient player is either an honest type who keeps their word whenever their announced action is feasible, or an opportunistic type who freely chooses announcements and feasible actions. Short-run players only observe the current-period announcement and whether the patient player has kept their word in the past. We provide sufficient conditions under which the patient player can secure their optimal commitment payoff by building a reputation for honesty. Our proof introduces a novel technique based on concentration inequalities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number105508
JournalJournal of Economic Theory
Volume204
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2022

Funding

We thank Mehmet Ekmekci, Faruk Gul, Navin Kartik, Giacomo Lanzani, David Levine, Wojciech Olszewski, Larry Samuelson, an associate editor, and two referees for helpful comments. We thank the National Science Foundation grants SES-1947021 and SES-1951056 for financial support.

Keywords

  • Concentration inequalities
  • Honesty
  • Learning
  • Reputation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A reputation for honesty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this