TY - JOUR
T1 - A review of quality of life instruments used in liver transplantation
AU - Jay, Colleen L.
AU - Butt, Zeeshan
AU - Ladner, Daniela P.
AU - Skaro, Anton I.
AU - Abecassis, Michael M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Research for this paper was done in part while the lead author was a National Research Service Award postdoctoral fellow with the Division of Organ Transplantation at Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine under an institutional award from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 5 T32 DK077662-02 (PI: Michael Abecassis, MD MBA).
PY - 2009/11
Y1 - 2009/11
N2 - With improvements in patient and graft survival after liver transplantation, recipient quality of life (QOL) has become an important focus of patient care and clinical outcomes research. To provide a better understanding of the instruments used to assess QOL in the adult liver transplant population, we conducted a systematic review of the MEDLINE database and Cochrane library. Our review identified 128 relevant articles utilizing more than 50 different QOL instruments. Generic health status instruments are the most commonly used, and among them the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) are the most prevalent. Few studies (16%) included targeted, disease-specific instruments. The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Quality of Life questionnaire, the Liver Disease Quality of Life questionnaire, and the Chronic Liver Disease questionnaire are the most frequently employed targeted instruments; however, these instruments have been designed to assess QOL in patients with chronic liver disease rather than patients after liver transplantation. The present review focuses on the psychometric properties of the existing QOL instruments and discusses their individual strengths and limitations in evaluating liver transplantation recipients. The lack of a gold-standard QOL instrument for liver transplant recipients is an impediment to cross-study comparisons. We conclude that the development of a QOL instrument specifically for liver transplant recipients will improve QOL assessment in this population leading to a more nuanced understanding of the factors that influence transplant recipients' well-being.
AB - With improvements in patient and graft survival after liver transplantation, recipient quality of life (QOL) has become an important focus of patient care and clinical outcomes research. To provide a better understanding of the instruments used to assess QOL in the adult liver transplant population, we conducted a systematic review of the MEDLINE database and Cochrane library. Our review identified 128 relevant articles utilizing more than 50 different QOL instruments. Generic health status instruments are the most commonly used, and among them the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) are the most prevalent. Few studies (16%) included targeted, disease-specific instruments. The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Quality of Life questionnaire, the Liver Disease Quality of Life questionnaire, and the Chronic Liver Disease questionnaire are the most frequently employed targeted instruments; however, these instruments have been designed to assess QOL in patients with chronic liver disease rather than patients after liver transplantation. The present review focuses on the psychometric properties of the existing QOL instruments and discusses their individual strengths and limitations in evaluating liver transplantation recipients. The lack of a gold-standard QOL instrument for liver transplant recipients is an impediment to cross-study comparisons. We conclude that the development of a QOL instrument specifically for liver transplant recipients will improve QOL assessment in this population leading to a more nuanced understanding of the factors that influence transplant recipients' well-being.
KW - LDQOL
KW - Liver transplantation
KW - Psychometrics
KW - Quality of life
KW - SF-36
KW - Systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349733395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349733395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.07.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.07.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 19775771
AN - SCOPUS:70349733395
SN - 0168-8278
VL - 51
SP - 949
EP - 959
JO - Journal of Hepatology
JF - Journal of Hepatology
IS - 5
ER -