TY - JOUR
T1 - A review of transactional sex for natural resources
T2 - Under-researched, overstated, or unique to fishing economies?
AU - Fiorella, Kathryn J.
AU - Desai, Pooja
AU - Miller, Joshua D.
AU - Okeyo, Nicky O.
AU - Young, Sera L.
N1 - Funding Information:
for this research was provided by Cornell University’s Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future (to KJF). SLY was supported by K01 MH098902 from the National Institutes of Mental Health. Funding for this research was provided by Cornell University's Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future (to KJF). SLY was supported by K01 MH098902 from the National Institute of Mental Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health or the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2019/12/2
Y1 - 2019/12/2
N2 - Environmental change is projected to decrease the availability of key natural resources. Decreasing availability of resources that support food security and livelihoods for vulnerable populations is hypothesised to increase engagement in transactional sex. Therefore, we systematically examined the peer-reviewed literature to characterise what is known about transactional sex for natural resources, document the natural resources that are exchanged for sex, and identify qualitative trends. Of the 1063 articles, 33 were retained for full abstraction. A majority of articles were published after 2005 (93%) and focused on Africa (90%). Two-thirds of articles focused on sex-for-fish exchanges. Reports of transactional sex were also found for other resources, including agricultural land (12%) as well as food, water, and fuel in emergency contexts (12%). Migration and altered resource availability were described as underlying causes of transactional sex. Some studies described an increased risk of sexually transmitted infection, including HIV, as a health consequence of transactional sex. We offer three possible explanations for why the preponderance of previous studies have focused on sex-for-fish rather than other natural resources, and suggest directions for future research.
AB - Environmental change is projected to decrease the availability of key natural resources. Decreasing availability of resources that support food security and livelihoods for vulnerable populations is hypothesised to increase engagement in transactional sex. Therefore, we systematically examined the peer-reviewed literature to characterise what is known about transactional sex for natural resources, document the natural resources that are exchanged for sex, and identify qualitative trends. Of the 1063 articles, 33 were retained for full abstraction. A majority of articles were published after 2005 (93%) and focused on Africa (90%). Two-thirds of articles focused on sex-for-fish exchanges. Reports of transactional sex were also found for other resources, including agricultural land (12%) as well as food, water, and fuel in emergency contexts (12%). Migration and altered resource availability were described as underlying causes of transactional sex. Some studies described an increased risk of sexually transmitted infection, including HIV, as a health consequence of transactional sex. We offer three possible explanations for why the preponderance of previous studies have focused on sex-for-fish rather than other natural resources, and suggest directions for future research.
KW - Fish-for-sex
KW - HIV risk
KW - climate change
KW - environmental change
KW - resource availability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068185398&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068185398&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/17441692.2019.1625941
DO - 10.1080/17441692.2019.1625941
M3 - Article
C2 - 31241005
AN - SCOPUS:85068185398
SN - 1744-1692
VL - 14
SP - 1803
EP - 1814
JO - Global Public Health
JF - Global Public Health
IS - 12
ER -
