A review of transactional sex for natural resources: Under-researched, overstated, or unique to fishing economies?

Kathryn J. Fiorella*, Pooja Desai, Joshua D. Miller, Nicky O. Okeyo, Sera L. Young

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Environmental change is projected to decrease the availability of key natural resources. Decreasing availability of resources that support food security and livelihoods for vulnerable populations is hypothesised to increase engagement in transactional sex. Therefore, we systematically examined the peer-reviewed literature to characterise what is known about transactional sex for natural resources, document the natural resources that are exchanged for sex, and identify qualitative trends. Of the 1063 articles, 33 were retained for full abstraction. A majority of articles were published after 2005 (93%) and focused on Africa (90%). Two-thirds of articles focused on sex-for-fish exchanges. Reports of transactional sex were also found for other resources, including agricultural land (12%) as well as food, water, and fuel in emergency contexts (12%). Migration and altered resource availability were described as underlying causes of transactional sex. Some studies described an increased risk of sexually transmitted infection, including HIV, as a health consequence of transactional sex. We offer three possible explanations for why the preponderance of previous studies have focused on sex-for-fish rather than other natural resources, and suggest directions for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1803-1814
Number of pages12
JournalGlobal Public Health
Volume14
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2 2019

Keywords

  • Fish-for-sex
  • HIV risk
  • climate change
  • environmental change
  • resource availability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A review of transactional sex for natural resources: Under-researched, overstated, or unique to fishing economies?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this