Abstract
A large experimental literature is devoted to studying discrimination. An important question for policymakers and firms is what drives the discrimination uncovered by those experiments. However, motivations are hard to determine when decision makers pay selective attention to information because their learning is private. We overcome this challenge by deriving conditions on average outcomes that reveal decision makers are prejudiced no matter what they learn about individuals in each demographic group before making their decisions. This provides a test of prejudice that is general, simple, and robust and that can potentially be used to identify prejudice in a wide range of important settings, such as hiring, consumer lending, and housing access. We demonstrate our test of prejudice using two influential labor market experiments.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 4527-4536 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Management Science |
Volume | 68 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2022 |
Funding
The authors thank Roland Bénabou, Quoc-Anh Do, Hanming Fang, Laura Gee, Alex Imas, Peter Klibanoff, Nicola Persico, Ernesto Reuben, Sigrid Suetens, our editors, and two anonymous referees for valuable feedback.
Keywords
- discrimination
- experiments
- inattention
- labor markets
- prejudice
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Strategy and Management
- Management Science and Operations Research