A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry

Chris Quintana*, Brian J. Reiser, Elizabeth A. Davis, Joseph Krajcik, Eric Fretz, Ravit Golan Duncan, Eleni Kyza, Daniel Edelson, Elliot Soloway

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

789 Scopus citations

Abstract

The notion of scaffolding learners to help them succeed in solving problems otherwise too difficult for them is an important idea that has extended into the design of scaffolded software tools for learners. However, although there is a growing body of work on scaffolded tools, scaffold design, and the impact of scaffolding, the field has not yet converged on a common theoretical framework that defines rationales and approaches to guide the design of scaffolded tools. In this article, we present a scaffolding design framework addressing scaffolded software tools for science inquiry. De veloped through iterative cycles of inductive and theory-based analysis, the framework synthesizes the work of prior design efforts, theoretical arguments, and empirical work in a set of guidelines that are organized around science inquiry practices and the challenges learners face in those practices. The framework can provide a basis for developing a theory of pedagogical support and a mechanism to describe successful scaffolding approaches. It can also guide design, not in a prescriptive manner but by providing designers with heuristics and examples of possible ways to address the challenges learners face.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)337-386
Number of pages50
JournalJournal of the Learning Sciences
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004

Funding

An earlier version of this article was presented at the October 2002 International Conference of the Learning Sciences. This research was conducted as part of the KDI/ASSESS project and the Center for Learning Technologies in Urban Schools, supported, in part, by National Science Foundations Grants REC–9980055 and REC–972038, respectively. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Science Foundation. All of the authors were involved in conceptualizing the work presented here. The writing was done by Chris Quintana, Brian J. Reiser, and Elizabeth A. Davis, with significant input from Joseph Krajcik.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this