A simple proximity heuristic allows tracking of multiple objects through occlusion

Steven L. Franconeri, Zenon W. Pylyshyn, Brian J. Scholl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Moving objects in the world present a challenge to the visual system, in that they often move in and out of view as they are occluded by other surfaces. Nevertheless, the ability to track multiple objects through periods of occlusion is surprisingly robust. Here, we identify a simple heuristic that underlies this ability: Pre- and postocclusion views of objects are linked together solely by their spatial proximity. Tracking through occlusion was always improved when the postocclusion instances reappeared closer to the preocclusion views. Strikingly, this was true even when objects' previous trajectories predicted different reappearance locations and when objects reappeared "too close," from invisible "slits" in empty space, rather than from more distant occluder contours. Tracking through occlusion appears to rely only on spatial proximity, and not on encoding heading information, likely reappearance locations, or the visible structure of occluders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)691-702
Number of pages12
JournalAttention, Perception, and Psychophysics
Volume74
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2012

Funding

We thank Todd Horowitz, Evan Palmer, Adriane Seiffert, and Dan Simons for helpful feedback and Andrea Cuddington, Pralle Kriengwatana, and Claudia Lau for their assistance in data collection. This work was supported by NSF CAREER Grant (S.F.) BCS-1056730.

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Attention: divided attention and inattention
  • Scene perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A simple proximity heuristic allows tracking of multiple objects through occlusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this