A study of the performance of patients with frontal lobe lesions in a financial planning task

Vinod Goel*, Jordan Grafman, Jinous Tajik, Sheldon Gana, David Danto

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

153 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It has long been argued that patients with lesions in the prefrontal cortex have difficulties in decision making and problem solving in real-world, ill-structured situations, particularly problem types involving planning and look-ahead components. Recently, several researchers have questioned our ability to capture and characterize these deficits adequately using just the standard neuropsychological test batteries, and have called for tests that reflect real-world task requirements more accurately. We present data from 10 patients with focal lesions to the prefrontal cortex and 10 normal control subjects engaged in a real-world financial planning task. We also introduce a theoretical framework and methodology developed in the cognitive science literature for quantifying and analysing the complex data generated by problem-solving tasks. Our findings indicate that patient performance is impoverished at a global level but not at the local level. Patients have difficulty in organizing and structuring their problem space. Once they begin problem solving, they have difficulty in allocating adequate effort to each problem-solving phase. Patients also have difficulty dealing with the fact that there are no right or wrong answers nor official termination points in real-world planning problems. They also find it problematic to generate their own feedback. They invariably terminate the session before the details are fleshed out and all the goals satisfied. Finally, patients do not take full advantage of the fact that constraints on real-world problems are negotiable. However it is nor necessary to postulate a 'planning' deficit. It is possible to understand the patients' difficulties in real world planning tasks in terms of the following four accepted deficits: inadequate access to 'structured event complexes', difficulty in generalizing front particulars, failure to shift between 'mental sets', and poor judgment regarding adequacy and completeness of a plan.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1805-1822
Number of pages18
JournalBrain
Volume120
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

Fingerprint

Frontal Lobe
Prefrontal Cortex
Medicine in Literature
Cognitive Science
Aptitude
Neuropsychological Tests
Decision Making
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Information processing theory
  • Planning
  • Prefrontal cortex
  • Problem solving

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Goel, Vinod ; Grafman, Jordan ; Tajik, Jinous ; Gana, Sheldon ; Danto, David. / A study of the performance of patients with frontal lobe lesions in a financial planning task. In: Brain. 1997 ; Vol. 120, No. 10. pp. 1805-1822.
@article{4f4e7c69d42d4b7883f139efacf4a2c3,
title = "A study of the performance of patients with frontal lobe lesions in a financial planning task",
abstract = "It has long been argued that patients with lesions in the prefrontal cortex have difficulties in decision making and problem solving in real-world, ill-structured situations, particularly problem types involving planning and look-ahead components. Recently, several researchers have questioned our ability to capture and characterize these deficits adequately using just the standard neuropsychological test batteries, and have called for tests that reflect real-world task requirements more accurately. We present data from 10 patients with focal lesions to the prefrontal cortex and 10 normal control subjects engaged in a real-world financial planning task. We also introduce a theoretical framework and methodology developed in the cognitive science literature for quantifying and analysing the complex data generated by problem-solving tasks. Our findings indicate that patient performance is impoverished at a global level but not at the local level. Patients have difficulty in organizing and structuring their problem space. Once they begin problem solving, they have difficulty in allocating adequate effort to each problem-solving phase. Patients also have difficulty dealing with the fact that there are no right or wrong answers nor official termination points in real-world planning problems. They also find it problematic to generate their own feedback. They invariably terminate the session before the details are fleshed out and all the goals satisfied. Finally, patients do not take full advantage of the fact that constraints on real-world problems are negotiable. However it is nor necessary to postulate a 'planning' deficit. It is possible to understand the patients' difficulties in real world planning tasks in terms of the following four accepted deficits: inadequate access to 'structured event complexes', difficulty in generalizing front particulars, failure to shift between 'mental sets', and poor judgment regarding adequacy and completeness of a plan.",
keywords = "Information processing theory, Planning, Prefrontal cortex, Problem solving",
author = "Vinod Goel and Jordan Grafman and Jinous Tajik and Sheldon Gana and David Danto",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/brain/120.10.1805",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "120",
pages = "1805--1822",
journal = "Brain",
issn = "0006-8950",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "10",

}

A study of the performance of patients with frontal lobe lesions in a financial planning task. / Goel, Vinod; Grafman, Jordan; Tajik, Jinous; Gana, Sheldon; Danto, David.

In: Brain, Vol. 120, No. 10, 01.01.1997, p. 1805-1822.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A study of the performance of patients with frontal lobe lesions in a financial planning task

AU - Goel, Vinod

AU - Grafman, Jordan

AU - Tajik, Jinous

AU - Gana, Sheldon

AU - Danto, David

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - It has long been argued that patients with lesions in the prefrontal cortex have difficulties in decision making and problem solving in real-world, ill-structured situations, particularly problem types involving planning and look-ahead components. Recently, several researchers have questioned our ability to capture and characterize these deficits adequately using just the standard neuropsychological test batteries, and have called for tests that reflect real-world task requirements more accurately. We present data from 10 patients with focal lesions to the prefrontal cortex and 10 normal control subjects engaged in a real-world financial planning task. We also introduce a theoretical framework and methodology developed in the cognitive science literature for quantifying and analysing the complex data generated by problem-solving tasks. Our findings indicate that patient performance is impoverished at a global level but not at the local level. Patients have difficulty in organizing and structuring their problem space. Once they begin problem solving, they have difficulty in allocating adequate effort to each problem-solving phase. Patients also have difficulty dealing with the fact that there are no right or wrong answers nor official termination points in real-world planning problems. They also find it problematic to generate their own feedback. They invariably terminate the session before the details are fleshed out and all the goals satisfied. Finally, patients do not take full advantage of the fact that constraints on real-world problems are negotiable. However it is nor necessary to postulate a 'planning' deficit. It is possible to understand the patients' difficulties in real world planning tasks in terms of the following four accepted deficits: inadequate access to 'structured event complexes', difficulty in generalizing front particulars, failure to shift between 'mental sets', and poor judgment regarding adequacy and completeness of a plan.

AB - It has long been argued that patients with lesions in the prefrontal cortex have difficulties in decision making and problem solving in real-world, ill-structured situations, particularly problem types involving planning and look-ahead components. Recently, several researchers have questioned our ability to capture and characterize these deficits adequately using just the standard neuropsychological test batteries, and have called for tests that reflect real-world task requirements more accurately. We present data from 10 patients with focal lesions to the prefrontal cortex and 10 normal control subjects engaged in a real-world financial planning task. We also introduce a theoretical framework and methodology developed in the cognitive science literature for quantifying and analysing the complex data generated by problem-solving tasks. Our findings indicate that patient performance is impoverished at a global level but not at the local level. Patients have difficulty in organizing and structuring their problem space. Once they begin problem solving, they have difficulty in allocating adequate effort to each problem-solving phase. Patients also have difficulty dealing with the fact that there are no right or wrong answers nor official termination points in real-world planning problems. They also find it problematic to generate their own feedback. They invariably terminate the session before the details are fleshed out and all the goals satisfied. Finally, patients do not take full advantage of the fact that constraints on real-world problems are negotiable. However it is nor necessary to postulate a 'planning' deficit. It is possible to understand the patients' difficulties in real world planning tasks in terms of the following four accepted deficits: inadequate access to 'structured event complexes', difficulty in generalizing front particulars, failure to shift between 'mental sets', and poor judgment regarding adequacy and completeness of a plan.

KW - Information processing theory

KW - Planning

KW - Prefrontal cortex

KW - Problem solving

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030860958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030860958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/brain/120.10.1805

DO - 10.1093/brain/120.10.1805

M3 - Article

VL - 120

SP - 1805

EP - 1822

JO - Brain

JF - Brain

SN - 0006-8950

IS - 10

ER -