A systematic review and meta-analysis on the influence of sociodemographic factors on amputation in patients with peripheral arterial disease

O. Parker Martinez*, Katharine Storo, Zachary Provenzano, Eric Murphy, Tadaki M. Tomita, Samantha Cox

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To identify disparities in sociodemographic factors that are associated with major lower limb amputation in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies that reported major lower limb amputation rates in patients with PAD among different sociodemographic groups. Data that compared amputation rates on the basis of sex, race, ethnicity, income, insurance, geography, and hospital type were collected and described. Outcomes were then aggregated and standardized, and a meta-analysis was performed to synthesis data into single odds ratios (ORs). Results: Forty-one studies were included in the review. There was no association found between males and females (OR, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.00). Compared with Whites, higher rates of amputation were seen among Blacks/African Americans (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.81-2.26) and Native Americans (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.04-1.45). No significant association was found between Whites and Asians, Native Hawaiians, or Pacific Islanders (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.00-1.33). Hispanics had higher rates of amputation compared with non-Hispanics (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.22-1.52). Compared with private insurance, higher rates of amputation were seen among Medicare patients (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.27-1.50), Medicaid patients (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.44-1.76), and noninsured patients (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.02-1.95). Compared with the richest income quartile, higher rates of amputation were seen among the second income quartile (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15), third income quartile (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.35), and bottom income quartile (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.24-1.49). There was no association found between rural and urban populations (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.92-1.97) or between teaching and nonteaching hospitals (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.91-1.12). Conclusions: Our study has identified a number of disparities and quantified the influence of sociodemographic factors on major lower limb amputation rates owing to PAD between groups. We believe these findings can be used to better target interventions aimed at decreasing amputation rates, although further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms behind our findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)169-178.e1
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume79
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2024

Funding

The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a conflict of interest.

Keywords

  • Amputation
  • Peripheral arterial disease
  • Peripheral vascular diseases
  • Sociodemographic factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic review and meta-analysis on the influence of sociodemographic factors on amputation in patients with peripheral arterial disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this