A temporal predictive code for voice motor control: Evidence from ERP and behavioral responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback

Roozbeh Behroozmand*, Stacey Sangtian, Oleg Korzyukov, Charles R. Larson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The predictive coding model suggests that voice motor control is regulated by a process in which the mismatch (error) between feedforward predictions and sensory feedback is detected and used to correct vocal motor behavior. In this study, we investigated how predictions about timing of pitch perturbations in voice auditory feedback would modulate ERP and behavioral responses during vocal production. We designed six counterbalanced blocks in which a +100 cents pitch-shift stimulus perturbed voice auditory feedback during vowel sound vocalizations. In three blocks, there was a fixed delay (500, 750 or 1000 ms) between voice and pitch-shift stimulus onset (predictable), whereas in the other three blocks, stimulus onset delay was randomized between 500, 750 and 1000 ms (unpredictable). We found that subjects produced compensatory (opposing) vocal responses that started at 80 ms after the onset of the unpredictable stimuli. However, for predictable stimuli, subjects initiated vocal responses at 20 ms before and followed the direction of pitch shifts in voice feedback. Analysis of ERPs showed that the amplitudes of the N1 and P2 components were significantly reduced in response to predictable compared with unpredictable stimuli. These findings indicate that predictions about temporal features of sensory feedback can modulate vocal motor behavior. In the context of the predictive coding model, temporally-predictable stimuli are learned and reinforced by the internal feedforward system, and as indexed by the ERP suppression, the sensory feedback contribution is reduced for their processing. These findings provide new insights into the neural mechanisms of vocal production and motor control.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalBrain research
Volume1636
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Sensory Feedback

Keywords

  • Auditory feedback
  • Event-related potential
  • Internal forward model
  • Pitch-shift stimulus
  • Predictive code
  • Voice motor control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Molecular Biology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Developmental Biology

Cite this

@article{4e8f02b381df4606946682b4e23f5abb,
title = "A temporal predictive code for voice motor control: Evidence from ERP and behavioral responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback",
abstract = "The predictive coding model suggests that voice motor control is regulated by a process in which the mismatch (error) between feedforward predictions and sensory feedback is detected and used to correct vocal motor behavior. In this study, we investigated how predictions about timing of pitch perturbations in voice auditory feedback would modulate ERP and behavioral responses during vocal production. We designed six counterbalanced blocks in which a +100 cents pitch-shift stimulus perturbed voice auditory feedback during vowel sound vocalizations. In three blocks, there was a fixed delay (500, 750 or 1000 ms) between voice and pitch-shift stimulus onset (predictable), whereas in the other three blocks, stimulus onset delay was randomized between 500, 750 and 1000 ms (unpredictable). We found that subjects produced compensatory (opposing) vocal responses that started at 80 ms after the onset of the unpredictable stimuli. However, for predictable stimuli, subjects initiated vocal responses at 20 ms before and followed the direction of pitch shifts in voice feedback. Analysis of ERPs showed that the amplitudes of the N1 and P2 components were significantly reduced in response to predictable compared with unpredictable stimuli. These findings indicate that predictions about temporal features of sensory feedback can modulate vocal motor behavior. In the context of the predictive coding model, temporally-predictable stimuli are learned and reinforced by the internal feedforward system, and as indexed by the ERP suppression, the sensory feedback contribution is reduced for their processing. These findings provide new insights into the neural mechanisms of vocal production and motor control.",
keywords = "Auditory feedback, Event-related potential, Internal forward model, Pitch-shift stimulus, Predictive code, Voice motor control",
author = "Roozbeh Behroozmand and Stacey Sangtian and Oleg Korzyukov and Larson, {Charles R.}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.brainres.2016.01.040",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1636",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Brain Research",
issn = "0006-8993",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

A temporal predictive code for voice motor control : Evidence from ERP and behavioral responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback. / Behroozmand, Roozbeh; Sangtian, Stacey; Korzyukov, Oleg; Larson, Charles R.

In: Brain research, Vol. 1636, 01.04.2016, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A temporal predictive code for voice motor control

T2 - Evidence from ERP and behavioral responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback

AU - Behroozmand, Roozbeh

AU - Sangtian, Stacey

AU - Korzyukov, Oleg

AU - Larson, Charles R.

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - The predictive coding model suggests that voice motor control is regulated by a process in which the mismatch (error) between feedforward predictions and sensory feedback is detected and used to correct vocal motor behavior. In this study, we investigated how predictions about timing of pitch perturbations in voice auditory feedback would modulate ERP and behavioral responses during vocal production. We designed six counterbalanced blocks in which a +100 cents pitch-shift stimulus perturbed voice auditory feedback during vowel sound vocalizations. In three blocks, there was a fixed delay (500, 750 or 1000 ms) between voice and pitch-shift stimulus onset (predictable), whereas in the other three blocks, stimulus onset delay was randomized between 500, 750 and 1000 ms (unpredictable). We found that subjects produced compensatory (opposing) vocal responses that started at 80 ms after the onset of the unpredictable stimuli. However, for predictable stimuli, subjects initiated vocal responses at 20 ms before and followed the direction of pitch shifts in voice feedback. Analysis of ERPs showed that the amplitudes of the N1 and P2 components were significantly reduced in response to predictable compared with unpredictable stimuli. These findings indicate that predictions about temporal features of sensory feedback can modulate vocal motor behavior. In the context of the predictive coding model, temporally-predictable stimuli are learned and reinforced by the internal feedforward system, and as indexed by the ERP suppression, the sensory feedback contribution is reduced for their processing. These findings provide new insights into the neural mechanisms of vocal production and motor control.

AB - The predictive coding model suggests that voice motor control is regulated by a process in which the mismatch (error) between feedforward predictions and sensory feedback is detected and used to correct vocal motor behavior. In this study, we investigated how predictions about timing of pitch perturbations in voice auditory feedback would modulate ERP and behavioral responses during vocal production. We designed six counterbalanced blocks in which a +100 cents pitch-shift stimulus perturbed voice auditory feedback during vowel sound vocalizations. In three blocks, there was a fixed delay (500, 750 or 1000 ms) between voice and pitch-shift stimulus onset (predictable), whereas in the other three blocks, stimulus onset delay was randomized between 500, 750 and 1000 ms (unpredictable). We found that subjects produced compensatory (opposing) vocal responses that started at 80 ms after the onset of the unpredictable stimuli. However, for predictable stimuli, subjects initiated vocal responses at 20 ms before and followed the direction of pitch shifts in voice feedback. Analysis of ERPs showed that the amplitudes of the N1 and P2 components were significantly reduced in response to predictable compared with unpredictable stimuli. These findings indicate that predictions about temporal features of sensory feedback can modulate vocal motor behavior. In the context of the predictive coding model, temporally-predictable stimuli are learned and reinforced by the internal feedforward system, and as indexed by the ERP suppression, the sensory feedback contribution is reduced for their processing. These findings provide new insights into the neural mechanisms of vocal production and motor control.

KW - Auditory feedback

KW - Event-related potential

KW - Internal forward model

KW - Pitch-shift stimulus

KW - Predictive code

KW - Voice motor control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961627446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961627446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.01.040

DO - 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.01.040

M3 - Article

C2 - 26835556

AN - SCOPUS:84961627446

VL - 1636

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Brain Research

JF - Brain Research

SN - 0006-8993

ER -