TY - JOUR
T1 - Ability of individuals with chronic hemiparetic stroke to locate their forearms during singlearm and between-Arms tasks
AU - Gurari, Netta
AU - Drogos, Justin M.
AU - Dewald, Julius P.A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Gurari et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - According to between-Arms assessments, more than 50% of individuals with stroke have an impaired position sense. Our previous work, which employed a clinical assessment and slightly differing tasks, indicates that individuals who have a deficit on a between-forearms position-localization task do not necessarily have a deficit on a single-forearm position-localization task. Objective Our goal here was to, using robotics tools, determine whether individuals with stroke who have a deficit when matching forearm positions within an arm also have a deficit when mirroring forearm positions between arms, independent of the arm that leads the task. Methods Eighteen participants with chronic hemiparetic stroke and nine controls completed a singlearm position-matching experiment and between-Arms position-mirroring experiment. For each experiment, the reference forearm (left/right) passively rotated about the elbow joint to a reference target location (flexion/extension), and then the participant actively rotated their same/opposite forearm to match/mirror the reference forearm's position. Participants with stroke were classified as having a position-matching/-mirroring deficit based on a quantitative threshold that was derived from the controls' data. Results On our single-Arm task, one participant with stroke was classified as having a positionmatching deficit with a mean magnitude of error greater than 10.7° when referencing their paretic arm. Position-matching ability did not significantly differ for the controls and the remaining seventeen participants with stroke. On our between-Arms task, sevenparticipants with stroke were classified as having a position-mirroring deficit with a mean magnitude of error greater than 10.1°. Position-mirroring accuracy was worse for these participants with stroke, when referencing their paretic arm, than the controls. Concluding remark Findings underscore the need for assessing within-Arm position-matching deficits, in addition to between-Arms position-mirroring deficits when referencing each arm, to comprehensively evaluate an individual's ability to locate their forearm(s).
AB - According to between-Arms assessments, more than 50% of individuals with stroke have an impaired position sense. Our previous work, which employed a clinical assessment and slightly differing tasks, indicates that individuals who have a deficit on a between-forearms position-localization task do not necessarily have a deficit on a single-forearm position-localization task. Objective Our goal here was to, using robotics tools, determine whether individuals with stroke who have a deficit when matching forearm positions within an arm also have a deficit when mirroring forearm positions between arms, independent of the arm that leads the task. Methods Eighteen participants with chronic hemiparetic stroke and nine controls completed a singlearm position-matching experiment and between-Arms position-mirroring experiment. For each experiment, the reference forearm (left/right) passively rotated about the elbow joint to a reference target location (flexion/extension), and then the participant actively rotated their same/opposite forearm to match/mirror the reference forearm's position. Participants with stroke were classified as having a position-matching/-mirroring deficit based on a quantitative threshold that was derived from the controls' data. Results On our single-Arm task, one participant with stroke was classified as having a positionmatching deficit with a mean magnitude of error greater than 10.7° when referencing their paretic arm. Position-matching ability did not significantly differ for the controls and the remaining seventeen participants with stroke. On our between-Arms task, sevenparticipants with stroke were classified as having a position-mirroring deficit with a mean magnitude of error greater than 10.1°. Position-mirroring accuracy was worse for these participants with stroke, when referencing their paretic arm, than the controls. Concluding remark Findings underscore the need for assessing within-Arm position-matching deficits, in addition to between-Arms position-mirroring deficits when referencing each arm, to comprehensively evaluate an individual's ability to locate their forearm(s).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055615821&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055615821&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0206518
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0206518
M3 - Article
C2 - 30372499
AN - SCOPUS:85055615821
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 13
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 10
M1 - e0206518
ER -