Accelerating translation of physical activity and cancer survivorship research into practice: Recommendations for a more integrated and collaborative approach

Siobhan M. Phillips*, Catherine M. Alfano, Frank M. Perna, Russell E. Glasgow

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

80 Scopus citations

Abstract

Physical activity has been deemed safe and effective in reducing many negative side effects of treatment for cancer survivors and promoting better overall health. However, most of this research has focused on highly controlled randomized trials and little of this research has been translated into care or policy for survivors. The purpose of the present article is to present a research agenda for the field to accelerate the dissemination and implementation of empirically supported physical activity interventions into care.Weprovide rationale for the role of basic, behavioral, clinical implementation, and population scientists in moving this science forward and call for a more coordinated effort across different phases of research. In addition, we provide key strategies and examples for ongoing and future studies using the RE-AIM (reach, efficacy/effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) framework and pose recommendations for collaborations between researchers and stakeholders to enhance the integration of this research into policy and practice. Overall, we recommend that physical activity and cancer survivorship research use additional study designs, include relevant stakeholders, and be more collaborative, integrated, contextual, and representative in terms of both setting and participants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)687-699
Number of pages13
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Epidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Accelerating translation of physical activity and cancer survivorship research into practice: Recommendations for a more integrated and collaborative approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this