Acceptability of the talking touchscreen for health literacy assessment

Kathleen J. Yost, Kimberly A Webster, David W. Baker, Elizabeth A. Jacobs, Andy Anderson, Elizabeth A Hahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Self-administration of a multimedia health literacy measure in clinic settings is a novel concept. Demonstrated ease of use and acceptability will help predicate the future value of this strategy. We previously demonstrated the acceptability of a Talking Touchscreen for health status assessment. For this study, we adapted the touchscreen for self-administration of a new health literacy measure. Primary care patients (n=610) in clinics for underserved populations completed health status and health literacy questions on the Talking Touchscreen and participated in an interview. Participants were 51% women, 10% age 60+, 67% African American, 18% without a high school education, and 14% without any prior computer experience. The majority (93%) had no difficulty using the touchscreen, including those who were computer-naive (87%). Most rated the screen design as very good or excellent (72%), including computer-naive patients (71%) and older patients (75%). Acceptability of the touchscreen did not differ by health literacy level. The Talking Touchscreen was easy to use and acceptable for self-administration of a new health literacy measure. Self-administration should reduce staff burden and costs, interview bias, and feelings of embarrassment by those with lower literacy. Tools like the Talking Touchscreen may increase exposure of underserved populations to new technologies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)80-92
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Health Communication
Volume15
Issue numberSUPPL. 2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 29 2010

Fingerprint

Health Literacy
Touch screens
Self Administration
self-administration
literacy
Health
health
Vulnerable Populations
Health Status
health status
Interviews
Multimedia
African Americans
school education
interview
Primary Health Care
Emotions
patient care
multimedia
new technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Communication
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Yost, Kathleen J. ; Webster, Kimberly A ; Baker, David W. ; Jacobs, Elizabeth A. ; Anderson, Andy ; Hahn, Elizabeth A. / Acceptability of the talking touchscreen for health literacy assessment. In: Journal of Health Communication. 2010 ; Vol. 15, No. SUPPL. 2. pp. 80-92.
@article{ad065d66ffc04b1b9364783a9c01d454,
title = "Acceptability of the talking touchscreen for health literacy assessment",
abstract = "Self-administration of a multimedia health literacy measure in clinic settings is a novel concept. Demonstrated ease of use and acceptability will help predicate the future value of this strategy. We previously demonstrated the acceptability of a Talking Touchscreen for health status assessment. For this study, we adapted the touchscreen for self-administration of a new health literacy measure. Primary care patients (n=610) in clinics for underserved populations completed health status and health literacy questions on the Talking Touchscreen and participated in an interview. Participants were 51{\%} women, 10{\%} age 60+, 67{\%} African American, 18{\%} without a high school education, and 14{\%} without any prior computer experience. The majority (93{\%}) had no difficulty using the touchscreen, including those who were computer-naive (87{\%}). Most rated the screen design as very good or excellent (72{\%}), including computer-naive patients (71{\%}) and older patients (75{\%}). Acceptability of the touchscreen did not differ by health literacy level. The Talking Touchscreen was easy to use and acceptable for self-administration of a new health literacy measure. Self-administration should reduce staff burden and costs, interview bias, and feelings of embarrassment by those with lower literacy. Tools like the Talking Touchscreen may increase exposure of underserved populations to new technologies.",
author = "Yost, {Kathleen J.} and Webster, {Kimberly A} and Baker, {David W.} and Jacobs, {Elizabeth A.} and Andy Anderson and Hahn, {Elizabeth A}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1080/10810730.2010.500713",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "80--92",
journal = "Journal of Health Communication",
issn = "1081-0730",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "SUPPL. 2",

}

Acceptability of the talking touchscreen for health literacy assessment. / Yost, Kathleen J.; Webster, Kimberly A; Baker, David W.; Jacobs, Elizabeth A.; Anderson, Andy; Hahn, Elizabeth A.

In: Journal of Health Communication, Vol. 15, No. SUPPL. 2, 29.09.2010, p. 80-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acceptability of the talking touchscreen for health literacy assessment

AU - Yost, Kathleen J.

AU - Webster, Kimberly A

AU - Baker, David W.

AU - Jacobs, Elizabeth A.

AU - Anderson, Andy

AU - Hahn, Elizabeth A

PY - 2010/9/29

Y1 - 2010/9/29

N2 - Self-administration of a multimedia health literacy measure in clinic settings is a novel concept. Demonstrated ease of use and acceptability will help predicate the future value of this strategy. We previously demonstrated the acceptability of a Talking Touchscreen for health status assessment. For this study, we adapted the touchscreen for self-administration of a new health literacy measure. Primary care patients (n=610) in clinics for underserved populations completed health status and health literacy questions on the Talking Touchscreen and participated in an interview. Participants were 51% women, 10% age 60+, 67% African American, 18% without a high school education, and 14% without any prior computer experience. The majority (93%) had no difficulty using the touchscreen, including those who were computer-naive (87%). Most rated the screen design as very good or excellent (72%), including computer-naive patients (71%) and older patients (75%). Acceptability of the touchscreen did not differ by health literacy level. The Talking Touchscreen was easy to use and acceptable for self-administration of a new health literacy measure. Self-administration should reduce staff burden and costs, interview bias, and feelings of embarrassment by those with lower literacy. Tools like the Talking Touchscreen may increase exposure of underserved populations to new technologies.

AB - Self-administration of a multimedia health literacy measure in clinic settings is a novel concept. Demonstrated ease of use and acceptability will help predicate the future value of this strategy. We previously demonstrated the acceptability of a Talking Touchscreen for health status assessment. For this study, we adapted the touchscreen for self-administration of a new health literacy measure. Primary care patients (n=610) in clinics for underserved populations completed health status and health literacy questions on the Talking Touchscreen and participated in an interview. Participants were 51% women, 10% age 60+, 67% African American, 18% without a high school education, and 14% without any prior computer experience. The majority (93%) had no difficulty using the touchscreen, including those who were computer-naive (87%). Most rated the screen design as very good or excellent (72%), including computer-naive patients (71%) and older patients (75%). Acceptability of the touchscreen did not differ by health literacy level. The Talking Touchscreen was easy to use and acceptable for self-administration of a new health literacy measure. Self-administration should reduce staff burden and costs, interview bias, and feelings of embarrassment by those with lower literacy. Tools like the Talking Touchscreen may increase exposure of underserved populations to new technologies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956995448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956995448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10810730.2010.500713

DO - 10.1080/10810730.2010.500713

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 80

EP - 92

JO - Journal of Health Communication

JF - Journal of Health Communication

SN - 1081-0730

IS - SUPPL. 2

ER -