TY - JOUR
T1 - Access and Representation
T2 - A Narrative Review of the Disparities in Access to Clinical Trials and Precision Oncology in Black men with Prostate Cancer
AU - Esdaille, Ashanda R.
AU - Ibilibor, Christine
AU - Holmes, Arturo
AU - Palmer, Nynikka R.
AU - Murphy, Adam B.
N1 - Funding Information:
AUA Urology Care Foundation Research Scholar Award sponsored by Bristol-Myers-Squibb University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Cancer Research Training Program supported by the CPRIT Research Training Award (RP170345)
Funding Information:
Financial Disclosure: Dr. Adam Murphy serves as a paid advisor for EpiScore and Oncotype Dx Prostate Cancer Assays; Dr. Nynikka Palmer is funded by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health, grant # K01CA211965.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Objective: To provide commentary on the disparities in access to clinical trials and precision oncology specific to Black men with Prostate Cancer (PCa) in the United States and lend a general framework to aid in closing these gaps. Materials and Methods: The ideas, commentaries and data presented in this narrative review were synthesized by utilizing qualitative and quantitative studies, reviews, and randomized control trials performed between 2010 and 2021. We searched PubMed using the key words “Medicaid”, “Medicare”, “clinical trials”, “African Americans”, “Black”, “underrepresentation”, “access”, “Prostate Cancer”, “minority recruitment”, “racial disparities”, “disparity”, “genomics”, “biomarkers”, “diagnostic” “prognostic”, “validation”, “precision medicine”, and “precision oncology” to identify important themes, trends and data described in the current review. Keywords were used alone and combination with both “AND” and “OR” terms. Results: Black men with prostate cancer (PCa) in the United States have earlier onset of disease, present with more advanced stages, and worse prostate cancer-specific survival than their White counterparts. Potential causative factors vary from disparities in health care access to differences in tumor immunobiology and genomics along with disparate screening rates, management patterns and underrepresentation in clinical and translational research such as clinical trials and precision oncology. Conclusion: To avoid increasing the racial disparity in PCa outcomes for Black men, we must increase inclusion of Black men into precision oncology and clinical trials, using multilevel change. Underrepresentation in clinical and translational research may potentiate poorly validated risk calculators and biomarkers, leading to poor treatment decisions in high-risk populations. Relevant actions include funding to include minority-serving institutions as recruitment sites, and inclusion of evidence based recruitment methods in funded research to increase Black representation in clinical trials and translational research.
AB - Objective: To provide commentary on the disparities in access to clinical trials and precision oncology specific to Black men with Prostate Cancer (PCa) in the United States and lend a general framework to aid in closing these gaps. Materials and Methods: The ideas, commentaries and data presented in this narrative review were synthesized by utilizing qualitative and quantitative studies, reviews, and randomized control trials performed between 2010 and 2021. We searched PubMed using the key words “Medicaid”, “Medicare”, “clinical trials”, “African Americans”, “Black”, “underrepresentation”, “access”, “Prostate Cancer”, “minority recruitment”, “racial disparities”, “disparity”, “genomics”, “biomarkers”, “diagnostic” “prognostic”, “validation”, “precision medicine”, and “precision oncology” to identify important themes, trends and data described in the current review. Keywords were used alone and combination with both “AND” and “OR” terms. Results: Black men with prostate cancer (PCa) in the United States have earlier onset of disease, present with more advanced stages, and worse prostate cancer-specific survival than their White counterparts. Potential causative factors vary from disparities in health care access to differences in tumor immunobiology and genomics along with disparate screening rates, management patterns and underrepresentation in clinical and translational research such as clinical trials and precision oncology. Conclusion: To avoid increasing the racial disparity in PCa outcomes for Black men, we must increase inclusion of Black men into precision oncology and clinical trials, using multilevel change. Underrepresentation in clinical and translational research may potentiate poorly validated risk calculators and biomarkers, leading to poor treatment decisions in high-risk populations. Relevant actions include funding to include minority-serving institutions as recruitment sites, and inclusion of evidence based recruitment methods in funded research to increase Black representation in clinical trials and translational research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118745055&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85118745055&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2021.09.004
DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2021.09.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 34582887
AN - SCOPUS:85118745055
SN - 0090-4295
VL - 163
SP - 90
EP - 98
JO - Urology
JF - Urology
ER -