Accidental truth and accidental justification

Baron Reed*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

The presence of accidentality in a subject's holding a belief is generally thought to be incompatible with that belief's being an instance of knowledge. Epistemologists have tended to focus on the accidentality of the truth of a belief. I argue (a) that it is also possible mat there be accidentality in the justification of a belief, and (b) that the consequences of this type of accidentality are potentially much more harmful than accidentality only in the truth of a belief.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57-67
Number of pages11
JournalPhilosophical Quarterly
Volume50
Issue number198
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Accidental truth and accidental justification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this