Abstract
Gangestad and Simpson's theory accounts for the existence of male strategic variation admirably well, although it does not specify the precise nature of the adaptation linking male developmental stability to strategic pluralism. In contrast, female strategic variation remains elusive. Empirical data suggest that genetic variation partly underlies such variation, but the causes of female strategic differences largely remain unexplained.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 2000 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Physiology
- Behavioral Neuroscience