Accuracy of hospital administrative data in reporting central line-associated bloodstream infections in newborns

Stephen W. Patrick*, Matthew M. Davis, Aileen B. Sedman, Jennifer A. Meddings, Sue Hieber, Grace M. Lee, Terri L. Stillwell, Carol E. Chenoweth, Claudia Espinosa, Robert E. Schumacher

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are a significant source of morbidity and mortality in the NICU. In 2010, Medicaid was mandated not to pay hospitals for treatment of CLABSI; however, the source of CLABSI data for this policy was not specified. Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of hospital administrative data compared with CLABSI confirmed by an infection control service. METHODS: We evaluated hospital administrative and infection control data for newborns admitted consecutively from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2010. Clinical and demographic data were collected through chart review. We compared cases of CLABSI identified by administrative data (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification 999.31) with infection control data that use national criteria from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as the gold standard. To ascertain the nature possible deficiencies in the administrative data, each patient's medical record was searched to determine if clinical phrases that commonly refer to CLABSI appeared. RESULTS: Of 2920 infants admitted to the NICU during our study period, 52 were identified as having a CLABSI: 42 by infection control data only, 7 through hospital administrative data only, and 3 appearing in both. Against the gold standard, hospital administrative data were 6.7% sensitive and 99.7% specific, with a positive predictive value of 30.0% and a negative predictive value of 98.6%. Only 48% of medical records indicated a CLABSI. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings from a major children's hospital NICU indicate that International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 993.31 is presently not accurate and cannot be used reliably to compare CLABSI rates in NICUs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S75-S80
JournalPediatrics
Volume131
Issue numberSUPPL.1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Keywords

  • CLABSI
  • Central line-associated bloodstream infection
  • Medicaid
  • Never event

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Accuracy of hospital administrative data in reporting central line-associated bloodstream infections in newborns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this