TY - JOUR
T1 - Accuracy of intraoperative computed tomography during deep brain stimulation procedures
T2 - Comparison with postoperative magnetic resonance imaging
AU - Bot, Maarten
AU - Van Den Munckhof, Pepijn
AU - Bakay, Roy
AU - Stebbins, Glenn
AU - Verhagen Metman, Leo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.
PY - 2017/7/1
Y1 - 2017/7/1
N2 - Objective: To determine the accuracy of intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) in localizing deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes by comparing this modality with postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Background: Optimal lead placement is a critical factor for the outcome of DBS procedures and preferably confirmed during surgery. iCT offers 3-dimensional verification of both microelectrode and lead location during DBS surgery. However, accurate electrode representation on iCT has not been extensively studied. Methods: DBS surgery was performed using the Leksell stereotactic G frame. Stereotactic coordinates of 52 DBS leads were determined on both iCT and postoperative MRI and compared with intended final target coordinates. The resulting absolute differences in X (medial-lateral), Y (anterior-posterior), and Z (dorsal-ventral) coordinates (ΔX, ΔY, and ΔZ) for both modalities were then used to calculate the euclidean distance. Results: Euclidean distances were 2.7 ± 1.1 and 2.5 ± 1.2 mm for MRI and iCT, respectively (p = 0.2). Conclusion: Postoperative MRI and iCT show equivalent DBS lead representation. Intraoperative localization of both microelectrode and DBS lead in stereotactic space enables direct adjustments. Verification of lead placement with postoperative MRI, considered to be the gold standard, is unnecessary.
AB - Objective: To determine the accuracy of intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) in localizing deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes by comparing this modality with postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Background: Optimal lead placement is a critical factor for the outcome of DBS procedures and preferably confirmed during surgery. iCT offers 3-dimensional verification of both microelectrode and lead location during DBS surgery. However, accurate electrode representation on iCT has not been extensively studied. Methods: DBS surgery was performed using the Leksell stereotactic G frame. Stereotactic coordinates of 52 DBS leads were determined on both iCT and postoperative MRI and compared with intended final target coordinates. The resulting absolute differences in X (medial-lateral), Y (anterior-posterior), and Z (dorsal-ventral) coordinates (ΔX, ΔY, and ΔZ) for both modalities were then used to calculate the euclidean distance. Results: Euclidean distances were 2.7 ± 1.1 and 2.5 ± 1.2 mm for MRI and iCT, respectively (p = 0.2). Conclusion: Postoperative MRI and iCT show equivalent DBS lead representation. Intraoperative localization of both microelectrode and DBS lead in stereotactic space enables direct adjustments. Verification of lead placement with postoperative MRI, considered to be the gold standard, is unnecessary.
KW - Deep brain stimulation
KW - Intraoperative computed tomography
KW - Movement disorders
KW - Stereotactic neurosurgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85022227843&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85022227843&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000475672
DO - 10.1159/000475672
M3 - Article
C2 - 28601874
AN - SCOPUS:85022227843
SN - 1011-6125
VL - 95
SP - 183
EP - 188
JO - Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
JF - Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
IS - 3
ER -