TY - JOUR
T1 - Acoustic versus phonetic representation of speech as reflected by the mismatch negativity event-related potential
AU - Sharma, A.
AU - Kraus, N.
AU - McGee, T.
AU - Carrell, T.
AU - Nicol, T.
PY - 1993
Y1 - 1993
N2 - The concept of categorical perception of speech and speech-like sounds has been central to models of speech perception for decades. Event-related potentials (ERPs) provide a neurophysiologic perspective of this important phenomenon. In the present experiment the mismatch negativity (MMN) event-related potential, which is sensitive to fine acoustic differences, was recorded in adults. Of interest was whether the MMN reflects the acoustic or categorical perception of speech. The MMN was elicited by stimulus pairs (along a continuum varying in place of articulation from /da/ to /ga/) which had been identified as the same phoneme /da/ (within category condition) and as different phonemes /da/ and /ga/ (across categories condition). The acoustic differences between these two pairs of stimuli were equivalent. The MMN was observed in all subjects both in the within and across category conditions. Furthermore, the MMN did not differ in latency, amplitude or area within and across categories. That is, the MMN indicated equal discrimination both across and within categories. These results suggest that the MMN appears to reflect the processing of acoustic aspects of the speech stimulus, but not phonetic processing into categories. The MMN appears to be an extremely sensitive electrophysiologic index of minimal acoustic differences in speech stimuli.
AB - The concept of categorical perception of speech and speech-like sounds has been central to models of speech perception for decades. Event-related potentials (ERPs) provide a neurophysiologic perspective of this important phenomenon. In the present experiment the mismatch negativity (MMN) event-related potential, which is sensitive to fine acoustic differences, was recorded in adults. Of interest was whether the MMN reflects the acoustic or categorical perception of speech. The MMN was elicited by stimulus pairs (along a continuum varying in place of articulation from /da/ to /ga/) which had been identified as the same phoneme /da/ (within category condition) and as different phonemes /da/ and /ga/ (across categories condition). The acoustic differences between these two pairs of stimuli were equivalent. The MMN was observed in all subjects both in the within and across category conditions. Furthermore, the MMN did not differ in latency, amplitude or area within and across categories. That is, the MMN indicated equal discrimination both across and within categories. These results suggest that the MMN appears to reflect the processing of acoustic aspects of the speech stimulus, but not phonetic processing into categories. The MMN appears to be an extremely sensitive electrophysiologic index of minimal acoustic differences in speech stimuli.
KW - Auditory
KW - Categorical perception
KW - Event-related potentials
KW - Mismatch negativity
KW - Speech
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027318813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027318813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0168-5597(93)90029-O
DO - 10.1016/0168-5597(93)90029-O
M3 - Article
C2 - 7681392
AN - SCOPUS:0027318813
SN - 0168-5597
VL - 88
SP - 64
EP - 71
JO - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/ Evoked Potentials
JF - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/ Evoked Potentials
IS - 1
ER -