Acute Adnexa with Preserved Flow to the Ovary: Could Isolated Tubal Torsion Be the Cause?

Kathryn L. McElhinney*, Michela Carter, Suhail Zeineddin, Joseph Pitt (Benjamin), Samantha L. Ahle, Mehul V. Raval, Seth D. Goldstein, Timothy B. Lautz, Julia E. Grabowski, Erin E. Rowell

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Study Objective: Isolated tubal torsion (ITT) is a surgical emergency that is less well characterized than ovarian torsion and presents with its own diagnostic challenges. We retrospectively examined patients with ITT and compared them to patients with ovarian torsion to better understand the unique features of this pathophysiologic process. Methods: The medical records of patients who were identified as having ITT or ovarian torsion intraoperatively between January 2019 and November 2022 were reviewed. Patient demographics, clinical documentation, diagnostic imaging reports, operative reports, and pathology results were collected. Results: A total of 82 patients met inclusion criteria of which 62 (75.6%) had ovarian torsion and 20 (24.4%) had ITT. Most patients (63.4%) underwent 2 or more imaging studies prior to the operating room. A diagnosis of torsion occurred more often on preoperative imaging for the ovarian torsion group (67.7% ovarian torsion vs 35.0% ITT, P =.01). Doppler flow to the ovary was expectedly absent in 65.9% of ovarian torsion patients but interestingly also absent in 25% of ITT patients (P =.01). Patients with ovarian torsion were more likely to have ovarian cysts (56.5% vs 10.0%, P <.001), while patients with ITT were significantly more likely to have a paratubal cyst (90.0% vs 38.7%, P <.001). Conclusion: ITT is a surgical emergency that poses a risk to future fertility. Ultrasound studies, including doppler, may not be as definitive in patients with ITT and early cross-sectional imaging should be considered. When there is a high clinical suspicion for ovarian torsion or ITT, there should be a low threshold for diagnostic laparoscopy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-194
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2025

Funding

The work presented in this manuscript was presented at the Clinical Congress 2023 of the American College of Surgeons in Boston, MA, October 22-25, 2023. Research reported in this publication was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health's National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant Number TL1TR001423 (KLM). The authors have nothing to disclose. Research reported in this publication was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health's National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences , Grant Number TL1TR001423 (KLM).

Keywords

  • Fallopian tube
  • Fertility
  • Isolated tubal torsion
  • Ovarian torsion
  • Ovary

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Acute Adnexa with Preserved Flow to the Ovary: Could Isolated Tubal Torsion Be the Cause?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this